OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in pregnancy and implantation rates as a function of the embryo placement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. SUBJECT(S): All fresh, nondonor IVF cycles performed in 2001. INTERVENTION(S): Alteration in embryo transfer (ET) target location from the fundal region to the middle to lower uterine segment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (sonographic sac evidence/number of transfer cycles), implantation rate (number of sacs/number of embryos transferred), patient age, peak E(2), and fertilization rate. RESULT(S): A total of 393 fundal and 273 lower to middle uterine segment ETs were performed. The pregnancy (PR), implantation, and birth rates were significantly higher after a middle to lower uterine segment ET compared with fundal ET (39.6% vs. 31.2%; 21% vs. 14%; and 34.1% vs. 26.2%, respectively). Groups did not differ regarding patient age, basal FSH, peak E(2), number of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, fertilization rate, embryo quality, or number of embryos transferred. CONCLUSION(S): Both PR and implantation rates are favorably affected by directing embryo placement to the lower to middle uterine segment. By some unknown mechanism, it appears that this endometrial location provides a more favorable region for embryo deposition.
OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in pregnancy and implantation rates as a function of the embryo placement. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. SUBJECT(S): All fresh, nondonor IVF cycles performed in 2001. INTERVENTION(S): Alteration in embryo transfer (ET) target location from the fundal region to the middle to lower uterine segment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (sonographic sac evidence/number of transfer cycles), implantation rate (number of sacs/number of embryos transferred), patient age, peak E(2), and fertilization rate. RESULT(S): A total of 393 fundal and 273 lower to middle uterine segment ETs were performed. The pregnancy (PR), implantation, and birth rates were significantly higher after a middle to lower uterine segment ET compared with fundal ET (39.6% vs. 31.2%; 21% vs. 14%; and 34.1% vs. 26.2%, respectively). Groups did not differ regarding patient age, basal FSH, peak E(2), number of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles, fertilization rate, embryo quality, or number of embryos transferred. CONCLUSION(S): Both PR and implantation rates are favorably affected by directing embryo placement to the lower to middle uterine segment. By some unknown mechanism, it appears that this endometrial location provides a more favorable region for embryo deposition.
Authors: Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Michael C Whitehouse; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Michael J Szmyga; Eli A Rybak; Edward J Nejat; Erika H Banks; Kathleen D Whitney; Alex J Polotsky; Debra S Heller; U Thomas Meier Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 7.329