Literature DB >> 15135978

Environmental modulation of the interoceptive effects of amphetamine in the rat.

Giovanna Paolone1, Margherita Palopoli, M Cristina Marrone, Paolo Nencini, Aldo Badiani.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of environmental novelty on amphetamine discrimination. Two groups of rats (home group and novelty group) were trained to perform water-reinforced operant behavior in cages equipped with two levers and a retractable liquid dipper (0.1cc cup). The experimental procedures for the two groups were identical except for the fact that home rats were housed and tested in the operant cages whereas novelty rats were transferred daily to these cages for the testing sessions (25min). The rats were trained to discriminate one of two doses of amphetamine (0.25 and 0.5mg/kg) from saline. Saline and amphetamine were administered intraperitoneally immediately before each daily session according to a semi-random schedule for a total of 50 sessions. Reinforcements were delivered according to a fixed ratio that was increased daily from 2 to 30. Successful drug discrimination was achieved when activity on the appropriate lever before the first reinforcement was greater than 80% of total activity, on at least seven out of eight consecutive sessions. When training was conducted with 0.25mg/kg of amphetamine, no home rat acquired drug discrimination whereas 56% of novelty rats reached criterion. When training was conducted with 0.5mg/kg of amphetamine, drug discrimination was achieved by 50% of home rat versus 86% of novelty rats. These findings indicate that environmental novelty can alter the ability of amphetamine to produce interoceptive cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135978     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  7 in total

1.  Rapid sensitization of physiological, neuronal, and locomotor effects of nicotine: critical role of peripheral drug actions.

Authors:  Magalie Lenoir; Jeremy S Tang; Amina S Woods; Eugene A Kiyatkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Opiate versus psychostimulant addiction: the differences do matter.

Authors:  Aldo Badiani; David Belin; David Epstein; Donna Calu; Yavin Shaham
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The Affective and Neural Correlates of Heroin versus Cocaine Use in Addiction Are Influenced by Environmental Setting But in Opposite Directions.

Authors:  Silvana De Pirro; Gaspare Galati; Luigi Pizzamiglio; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Opposite environmental regulation of heroin and amphetamine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Daniele Caprioli; Michele Celentano; Giovanna Paolone; Federica Lucantonio; Andrea Bari; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Environmental modulation of cocaine self-administration in the rat.

Authors:  Daniele Caprioli; Giovanna Paolone; Michele Celentano; Arianna Testa; Paolo Nencini; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Ultrasonic vocalization in rats self-administering heroin and cocaine in different settings: evidence of substance-specific interactions between drug and setting.

Authors:  Riccardo Avvisati; Laura Contu; Emiliana Stendardo; Caterina Michetti; Christian Montanari; Maria Luisa Scattoni; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Heroin versus cocaine: opposite choice as a function of context but not of drug history in the rat.

Authors:  Maria Teresa De Luca; Christian Montanari; Maria Meringolo; Laura Contu; Michele Celentano; Aldo Badiani
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.