Literature DB >> 15135834

The Gini coefficient as a measure for understanding accrual inequalities in multicenter clinical studies.

Anna-Bettina Haidich1, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical sites participating in multicenter trials may have unequal performance in recruiting subjects. We propose using the Gini coefficient as a quantitative measure of site accrual inequalities. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We evaluated the relationship of this metric to other study characteristics across 166 clinical studies (27,865 subjects) conducted by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group between 1986 and 1999.
RESULTS: Overall there was a modest recruitment inequality among clinical centers (mean Gini=0.33). In multivariate modeling, site accrual inequalities were higher when there was more protracted enrollment, and a larger number of sites and were lower in antiretroviral studies than other studies. In long-term studies, the site accrual inequality increased significantly over time (P=0.004). In efficacy trials, a higher Gini coefficient was associated with higher likelihood of the study results being statistically significant (P=0.010).
CONCLUSION: The Gini coefficient may be easily and routinely incorporated in the description of the characteristics of a clinical study and may provide insights about its enrollment pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135834     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

1.  General practitioners choose within a narrow range of drugs when initiating new treatments: a cohort study of cardiovascular drug formularies.

Authors:  Allan Buusman; Jakob Kragstrup; Morten Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The landscape of international living kidney donation in the United States.

Authors:  Fawaz Al Ammary; Alvin G Thomas; Allan B Massie; Abimereki D Muzaale; Ashton A Shaffer; Brittany Koons; Mohamud A Qadi; Deidra C Crews; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Hai Fang; Daniel C Brennan; Krista L Lentine; Dorry L Segev; Macey L Henderson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Planning a cluster randomized trial with unequal cluster sizes: practical issues involving continuous outcomes.

Authors:  Lydia Guittet; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Coarse-graining bacteria colonies for modelling critical solute distributions in picolitre bioreactors for bacterial studies on single-cell level.

Authors:  Christoph Westerwalbesloh; Alexander Grünberger; Wolfgang Wiechert; Dietrich Kohlheyer; Eric von Lieres
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.813

5.  The Successful Synchronized Orchestration of an Investigator-Initiated Multicenter Trial Using a Clinical Trial Management System and Team Approach: Design and Utility Study.

Authors:  Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam; Alexandra Brown; Elizabeth Kerling; Susan E Carlson; Christina J Valentine; Byron Gajewski
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.