Literature DB >> 15135641

Dissimilar genome response to acute and chronic low-dose radiation in male and female mice.

Olga Kovalchuk1, André Ponton, Jody Filkowski, Igor Kovalchuk.   

Abstract

The long-term genetic consequences of chronic exposure to low-dose irradiation constitutes a major concern to the general public and research community, especially as chronic radiation has recently been proven to be much more mutagenic and carcinogenic than previously thought. Here we report the results of the first ever comparison of the effects of acute and chronic whole body low-dose radiation exposure on global gene expression. We found a substantial difference between males and females in the expression of genes involved in signaling, growth control, transcription and other pathways upon acute and chronic radiation exposure. Specifically, we found sex differences in the expression of genes coding for G protein-coupled receptors and nuclear receptors. We also found different induction of PKCdelta, PKCbeta and PKCmu, members of PKC signaling pathway as well as in TGF and WNT signaling in males and females. Very pronounced difference, that was confirmed on the level of protein, was observed in the expression of WNT5A that plays an important role in carcinogenesis and muscle regeneration. WNT5A expression was significantly elevated only in chronically exposed females. We also provide the first evidence of the effect of ionizing radiation on the estrogen receptor in females. Repetitive irradiation of muscle tissue has been linked to development of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), which, enigmatically, occurs more frequently in males. Our data may be used to study possible mechanisms of RMS development upon chronic radiation exposure. They may provide some clues about the molecular background of the sex differences of RMS occurrence and may in the future lead to the discovery of new biomarkers for RMS predisposition in the irradiated tissue. Overall, differences in male and female responses to acute and chronic low-dose radiation obtained by this study were more drastic than we could have predicted. If confirmed in other experimental systems, these findings could potentially lead to fundamental changes in radiation safety regulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135641     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  12 in total

1.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Molecular and cellular profiling of acute responses to total body radiation exposure in ovariectomized female cynomolgus macaques.

Authors:  Ryne J DeBo; Thomas C Register; David L Caudell; Gregory D Sempowski; Gregory Dugan; Shauna Gray; Kouros Owzar; Chen Jiang; J Daniel Bourland; Nelson J Chao; J Mark Cline
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Evolutionarily conserved serum microRNAs predict radiation-induced fatality in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Wojciech Fendler; Beata Malachowska; Khyati Meghani; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Chandan Guha; Vijay K Singh; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  Disruption of the circadian clock due to the Clock mutation has discrete effects on aging and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Marina P Antoch; Victoria Y Gorbacheva; Olena Vykhovanets; Illia A Toshkov; Roman V Kondratov; Anna A Kondratova; Choogon Lee; Alexander Yu Nikitin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Study logistics that can impact medical countermeasure efficacy testing in mouse models of radiation injury.

Authors:  Andrea L DiCarlo; Zulmarie Perez Horta; Carmen I Rios; Merriline M Satyamitra; Lanyn P Taliaferro; David R Cassatt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  A single whole-body low dose X-irradiation does not affect L1, B1 and IAP repeat element DNA methylation longitudinally.

Authors:  Michelle R Newman; Pamela J Sykes; Benjamin J Blyth; Eva Bezak; Mark D Lawrence; Katherine L Morel; Rebecca J Ormsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in sustained alterations in protein expression between livers of mice exposed to high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate radiation.

Authors:  Tetsuo Nakajima; Bing Wang; Tetsuya Ono; Yoshihiko Uehara; Shingo Nakamura; Kazuaki Ichinohe; Ignacia Braga-Tanaka; Satoshi Tanaka; Kimio Tanaka; Mitsuru Nenoi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Investigation of X-ray permeability of surgical gloves coated with different contrast agents.

Authors:  Mustafa Kayan; Selçuk Yaşar; Mustafa Saygın; Ömer Yılmaz; Aykut Recep Aktaş; Fatmanur Kayan; Yasin Türker; Gürsel Çetinkaya
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.596

9.  Analysis of gene expression in normal and cancer cells exposed to gamma-radiation.

Authors:  M Ahmad Chaudhry
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2008

10.  Overexpression of Wnt5a promotes angiogenesis in NSCLC.

Authors:  Lingli Yao; Baocun Sun; Xiulan Zhao; Xueming Zhao; Qiang Gu; Xueyi Dong; Yanjun Zheng; Junying Sun; Runfen Cheng; Hong Qi; Jindan An
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.