Literature DB >> 15134699

Inhibitory processing during the Go/NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Janette L Smith1, Stuart J Johnstone, Robert J Barry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous event-related potential (ERP) research on inhibitory functioning in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) has often failed to use tasks which optimally assess inhibition. We report on an improved measure of inhibitory function, involving inhibition of a prepotent response, in children with AD/HD.
METHODS: Twelve males with AD/HD and 12 control males, aged 7-12 years, completed a cued Go/NoGo task where Go stimuli were presented on 70% of trials. ERP and behavioural measures were collected, together with reading, spelling and full-scale IQ scores.
RESULTS: The behavioural performance of children with AD/HD was not significantly different from normal controls, although children with AD/HD made faster responses and more errors. Group differences were apparent in the early processing components (P1, N1, P2) of responses to Warning, Go and NoGo stimuli. For the frontally maximal N2, a NoGo>Go effect was found, consistent with previous work linking this component with inhibitory processing. In control children this effect was particularly strong in the right frontal region, while children with AD/HD showed a much larger NoGo>Go effect, and an earlier N2 peak, than controls, with a focal shift to the left frontal region.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with normal controls, children with AD/HD demonstrate early stimulus processing atypicalities, suggesting problems with sensory registration and identification of stimuli. Further, N2 results suggest that children with AD/HD must trigger the inhibition process earlier and more strongly than controls to perform at a comparable behavioural level. SIGNIFICANCE: The results support the theory that behavioural inhibition is deficient in AD/HD, as children with AD/HD show abnormalities in inhibitory ERP components relating to the effort involved in inhibiting a prepotent response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15134699     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  32 in total

1.  From ERPs to Academics.

Authors:  Charles H Hillman; Matthew B Pontifex; Robert W Motl; Kevin C O'Leary; Christopher R Johnson; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Darla M Castelli
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Long-term deficits of preterm birth: evidence for arousal and attentional disturbances.

Authors:  R Whit Hall; Tiffany Wallace Huitt; Richa Thapa; D Keith Williams; K J S Anand; Edgar Garcia-Rill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Developmental change in the neurophysiological correlates of self-regulation in high- and low-emotion conditions.

Authors:  Connie Lamm; Marc D Lewis
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Kin rejection: social signals, neural response and perceived distress during social exclusion.

Authors:  Anirudh Sreekrishnan; Tania A Herrera; Jia Wu; Jessica L Borelli; Lars O White; Helena J V Rutherford; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-06-09

5.  EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL STUDY OF ATTENTION REGULATION DURING ILLUSORY FIGURE CATEGORIZATION TASK IN ADHD, AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER, AND TYPICAL CHILDREN.

Authors:  Estate M Sokhadze; Joshua M Baruth; Lonnie Sears; Guela E Sokhadze; Ayman S El-Baz; Emily Williams; Robert Klapheke; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2012-03-02

6.  Neural correlates (ERP/fMRI) of voluntary selection in adult ADHD patients.

Authors:  Susanne Karch; Tobias Thalmeier; Jürgen Lutz; Anja Cerovecki; Markus Opgen-Rhein; Bettina Hock; Gregor Leicht; Kristina Hennig-Fast; Thomas Meindl; Michael Riedel; Christoph Mulert; Oliver Pogarell
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system.

Authors:  Gian Candrian; Juri D Kropotov; Valery A Ponomarev; Gian-Marco Baschera; Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

8.  Evidence for specificity of ERP abnormalities during response inhibition in ADHD children: a comparison with reading disorder children without ADHD.

Authors:  Mario Liotti; Steven R Pliszka; Kellie Higgins; Ricardo Perez; Margaret Semrud-Clikeman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  The neural correlates of temperamental inhibitory control in toddlers.

Authors:  Caroline P Hoyniak; Isaac T Petersen; John E Bates; Dennis L Molfese
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The effects of methylphenidate on cerebral activations to salient stimuli in healthy adults.

Authors:  Olivia M Farr; Sien Hu; David Matuskey; Sheng Zhang; Osama Abdelghany; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.