Literature DB >> 15132327

Primary exchange revision arthroplasty for infected total knee replacement: a long-term study.

Frederick F Buechel1, Frank P Femino, Jerry D'Alessio.   

Abstract

Infected knee replacement is a serious complication that requires significant hospital-based resources for successful management. A successful primary exchange revision technique offers decreased morbidity for the patient by eliminating a second major operation and associated hospitalization, which in turn substantially reduces the cost associated with this dreaded condition. Twenty-two consecutive infected primary total knee arthroplasties in 22 patients were treated with primary exchange revision arthroplasties using antibiotic-impregnated cement. The surgical technique consisted of excision of draining sinuses, complete synovectomy, removal of granulation tissue, and debulking of the extensor mechanism. Postoperative treatment consisted of 4 to 6 weeks of parenterally administered antibiotics and 6 to 12 months of orally administered antibiotics. Both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms were treated. At an average follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 1.4 to 19.6 years), 90.9% were free of recurrent infection. Knee scores averaged 79.5, with 85.7% good or excellent results. The physiological classification of the host appeared to influence the outcome of revision. All patients in class A or B (20 knees) had successful eradication of their primary infection after 1-stage revision, whereas the only failure in the group was a physiological class C patient, who eventually expired from ongoing end-organ liver failure. These results compare most favorably with those of delayed-exchange revision arthroplasty while providing a more cost-effective management program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15132327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  31 in total

1.  High rate of infection control with one-stage revision of septic knee prostheses excluding MRSA and MRSE.

Authors:  Joachim Singer; Andreas Merz; Lars Frommelt; Bernd Fink
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Periprosthetic knee infection. One-stage exchange].

Authors:  C Friesecke; J Wodtke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Clinical faceoff: One- versus two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Infection recurrence factors in one- and two-stage total knee prosthesis exchanges.

Authors:  P Massin; T Delory; L Lhotellier; G Pasquier; O Roche; A Cazenave; C Estellat; J Y Jenny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Direct exchange endoprosthetic reconstruction with tumour prosthesis for periprosthetic knee infection associated with segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Manjunath Ramappa; Ian McMurtry; Andrew Port
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-01-12

9.  [Management of periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  C Friesecke; J Wodtke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Ioannis Stogiannidis; Antti Malmivaara; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.