Literature DB >> 15132291

Can functional status, after rehabilitation, independently predict long-term mortality of hip-fractured elderly patients?

Yichayaou Beloosesky1, Avraham Weiss, Joseph Grinblat, Shai Brill, Avital Hershkovitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hip fractures are one of the most serious causes of functional impairment and death in the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the predictive value of functional performance, after rehabilitation, of hip fracture on long-term mortality in community-dwelling patients.
METHODS: One hundred and seventy-one patients aged 60 years and over, admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation day unit after inpatient rehabilitation, were followed for up to 4 years. Main outcome measures were Functional Independent Measure (FIM), Timed Get Up and Go test (GUAG), cognitive status using the Mini-Mental State Examination on admission, and mortality during the follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out on survival curves.
RESULTS: All 24 deceased patients performed the GUAG test in > 20 seconds. Although approaching significance, the survival curves were not statistically different between patients performing the test in < or = 20 and those performing it in > 20 seconds (p = 0.08). Survival curves were significantly higher in patients with a FIM score of > or = 90 (p = 0.004), no cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) diseases (p = 0.001) and no diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01). There were no differences in survival according to age, gender, educational level, marital status, surgical vs conservative treatment, and cognition. A multivariate analysis including FIM score, CCV diseases and diabetes mellitus, demonstrated that only CCV disease was an independent variable for survival (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Performance, as evidenced by FIM scores after rehabilitation for hip fracture, may provide additional useful information on long-term survival. However, since functional status after rehabilitation is not an independent risk factor for long-term mortality, its predictive value must be interpreted in view of the comorbidities, mainly CCV diseases, which are more important to the risk of mortality than the event of hip fracture itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15132291     DOI: 10.1007/bf03324531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  A prognostic model predicting recovery of walking independence of elderly patients after hip-fracture surgery. An experiment in a rehabilitation unit in Northern Italy.

Authors:  G Bellelli; M Noale; F Guerini; R Turco; S Maggi; G Crepaldi; M Trabucchi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Exposure to medicines among patients admitted for hip fracture and the case-fatality rate at 1 year: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  A Agustí; E Pagès; A Cuxart; E Ballarín; X Vidal; J Teixidor; J Tomás; M M Villar; J-R Laporte
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Risk factors for mortality and survival rates in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture.

Authors:  Ahmet Aslan; Tolga Atay; Nevres Hürriyet Aydoğan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

4.  HIP FRACTURE: POST-OPERATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Marcelo Teodoro Ezequiel Guerra; Thomas Alexandre Thober; André Vicente Bigolin; Marcos Paulo de Souza; Simone Echeveste
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16

5.  Factors Affecting Mortality and Hospital Admissions after Hip Surgery among Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture in Hong Kong - Review of a Three-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Apple Qiao-Ling Wang; Bobby Hin-Po Ng; Lydia Po-Chee Cheung; Raymond Ping-Hong Chin
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 0.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.