BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes without clinically apparent coronary artery disease are at increased risk of cardiac death. The value of screening stress testing in these patients remains controversial. The goal of this study was to examine the yield of stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in asymptomatic diabetic patients. METHODS: The results of stress SPECT in patients without prior myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization were compared in asymptomatic diabetics (n = 1738) versus symptomatic diabetic patients (n = 2998), asymptomatic nondiabetic patients (n = 6215), and symptomatic nondiabetic patients (n = 16,214). RESULTS: Abnormal scans were present in 58.6% of asymptomatic diabetic patients, approximately equal to the percentage in symptomatic diabetic (59.5%) (P = not significant) and higher than in asymptomatic nondiabetic (46.2%) (P <.001) and symptomatic nondiabetic (44.4%) (P <.001) patients. The breakdown of high-risk scans followed a similar pattern in the 4 patient subsets: asymptomatic diabetic, 19.7% versus symptomatic diabetic, 22.2% (P =.051); asymptomatic nondiabetic, 11.1% (P <.001); and symptomatic nondiabetic, 12.5% (P <.001). Patients with diabetes had more electrocardiographic and scan evidence for silent myocardial infarction versus those without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic diabetic patients have a high prevalence of both abnormal and high-risk SPECT scans. The finding that approximately 1 in 5 of these individuals has a high-risk scan suggests a potentially more widespread application of screening stress SPECT in asymptomatic diabetic patients to identify those with severe coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND:Patients with diabetes without clinically apparent coronary artery disease are at increased risk of cardiac death. The value of screening stress testing in these patients remains controversial. The goal of this study was to examine the yield of stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in asymptomatic diabeticpatients. METHODS: The results of stress SPECT in patients without prior myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization were compared in asymptomatic diabetics (n = 1738) versus symptomatic diabeticpatients (n = 2998), asymptomatic nondiabetic patients (n = 6215), and symptomatic nondiabetic patients (n = 16,214). RESULTS: Abnormal scans were present in 58.6% of asymptomatic diabeticpatients, approximately equal to the percentage in symptomatic diabetic (59.5%) (P = not significant) and higher than in asymptomatic nondiabetic (46.2%) (P <.001) and symptomatic nondiabetic (44.4%) (P <.001) patients. The breakdown of high-risk scans followed a similar pattern in the 4 patient subsets: asymptomatic diabetic, 19.7% versus symptomatic diabetic, 22.2% (P =.051); asymptomatic nondiabetic, 11.1% (P <.001); and symptomatic nondiabetic, 12.5% (P <.001). Patients with diabetes had more electrocardiographic and scan evidence for silent myocardial infarction versus those without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic diabeticpatients have a high prevalence of both abnormal and high-risk SPECT scans. The finding that approximately 1 in 5 of these individuals has a high-risk scan suggests a potentially more widespread application of screening stress SPECT in asymptomatic diabeticpatients to identify those with severe coronary artery disease.
Authors: Wanda Acampa; Mario Petretta; Laura Evangelista; Stefania Daniele; Evgjeni Xhoxhi; Maria Luisa De Rimini; Corrado Cittanti; Filippo Marranzano; Marco Spadafora; Sergio Baldari; Luigi Mansi; Alberto Cuocolo Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jamieson M Bourque; Chetan A Patel; Mohamed M Ali; Margarita Perez; Denny D Watson; George A Beller Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Arthur J H A Scholte; Joanne D Schuijf; Antje V Kharagjitsingh; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 9.236