Literature DB >> 15131156

Performance assessment of DNA fragment sizing by high-sensitivity flow cytometry and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Matthew M Ferris1, Xiaomei Yan, Robbert C Habbersett, Yulin Shou, Cheryl L Lemanski, James H Jett, Thomas M Yoshida, Babetta L Marrone.   

Abstract

The sizing of restriction fragments is the chief analytical technique utilized in the production of DNA fingerprints. Few techniques have been able to compete with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), which is capable of discriminating among bacteria at species and strain levels by resolving restriction fragments. However, an ultrasensitive flow cytometer (FCM) developed in our lab has also demonstrated the ability to discriminate bacteria at species and strain levels. The abilities of FCM warrant a quantitative parallel comparison with PFGE to assess and evaluate the accuracy and precision of DNA fragment sizing by both techniques. Replicate samples of Staphylococcus aureus Mu50 were analyzed along with two clinical S. aureus isolates. The absolute fragment sizing accuracy was determined for PFGE (5% +/- 2%) and FCM (4% +/- 4%), with sequence-predicted Mu50 SmaI fragment sizes used as a reference. Precision was determined by simple arithmetic methods (relative standard deviation for PFGE [RSD(PFGE) ] = 3% +/- 2% and RSD(FCM) = 1.2% +/- 0.8%) as well as by the use of dendrograms derived from Dice coefficient-unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) and Pearson-UPGMA analyses. All quantitative measures of PFGE and FCM precision were equivalent, within error. The precision of both methods was not limited by any single sample preparation or analysis step that was tracked in this study. Additionally, we determined that the curve-based clustering of fingerprint data provided a more informative and useful assessment than did traditional band-based methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131156      PMCID: PMC404634          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1965-1976.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  35 in total

1.  Separation of long DNA molecules in a microfabricated entropic trap array.

Authors:  J Han; H G Craighead
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Characterization and optimization of an entropic trap for DNA separation.

Authors:  Jongyoon Han; Harold G Craighead
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Bacteria genome fingerprinting by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Z Huang; J H Jett; R A Keller
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1999-02-01

4.  Assessment of resolution and intercenter reproducibility of results of genotyping Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragments: a multicenter study.

Authors:  A van Belkum; W van Leeuwen; M E Kaufmann; B Cookson; F Forey; J Etienne; R Goering; F Tenover; C Steward; F O'Brien; W Grubb; P Tassios; N Legakis; A Morvan; N El Solh; R de Ryck; M Struelens; S Salmenlinna; J Vuopio-Varkila; M Kooistra; A Talens; W Witte; H Verbrugh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A matrix for DNA separation: genotyping and sequencing using poly(vinylpyrrolidone) solution in uncoated capillaries.

Authors:  Q Gao; E S Yeung
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing.

Authors:  F C Tenover; R D Arbeit; R V Goering; P A Mickelsen; B E Murray; D H Persing; B Swaminathan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Genotyping of a homogeneous group of Yersinia pestis strains isolated in the United States.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhe Huang; May C Chu; Dave M Engelthaler; Luther E Lindler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  D C Schwartz; C R Cantor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Optimization of computer software settings improves accuracy of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis macrorestriction fragment pattern analysis.

Authors:  William M Duck; Christine D Steward; Shailen N Banerjee; John E McGowan; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  J Maule
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Beyond gel electrophoresis: microfluidic separations, fluorescence burst analysis, and DNA stretching.

Authors:  Kevin D Dorfman; Scott B King; Daniel W Olson; Joel D P Thomas; Douglas R Tree
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Differentiation of Bacillus anthracis, B. cereus, and B. thuringiensis by using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  Wenwan Zhong; Yulin Shou; Thomas M Yoshida; Babetta L Marrone
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Analysis of single nucleic acid molecules in micro- and nano-fluidics.

Authors:  Sarah M Friedrich; Helena C Zec; Tza-Huei Wang
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Chromosome-level genome assembly and manually-curated proteome of model necrotroph Parastagonospora nodorum Sn15 reveals a genome-wide trove of candidate effector homologs, and redundancy of virulence-related functions within an accessory chromosome.

Authors:  Stefania Bertazzoni; Darcy A B Jones; Huyen T Phan; Kar-Chun Tan; James K Hane
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  ENVirT: inference of ecological characteristics of viruses from metagenomic data.

Authors:  Duleepa Jayasundara; Damayanthi Herath; Damith Senanayake; Isaam Saeed; Cheng-Yu Yang; Yuan Sun; Bill C Chang; Sen-Lin Tang; Saman K Halgamuge
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.