Literature DB >> 15131048

The prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow in breast cancer patients: evaluation of morphological categories and the number of clinically significant cells.

Bjørn Naume1, Gro Wiedswang, Elin Borgen, Gunnar Kvalheim, Rolf Kåresen, Hanne Qvist, Jan Janbu, Torstein Harbitz, Jahn M Nesland.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: PURPOSE/EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Immunocytochemical detection of isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the bone marrow (BM) is a prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, hematopoietic cells (HCs) can occasionally be stained by the techniques used. Morphological evaluation improves the specificity of ITC detection, but optimal separation of ITCs from false-positive HCs needs to be determined. Here, predetermined morphological categories of immunocytochemically (ICC)-positive cells in the BM and the number of detected ITCs were analyzed for association with clinical outcome in 817 early-stage breast cancer patients (median 49 months of follow-up). All ICC+ cells detected were categorized into one of the following groups: (a) tumor cell (TC); (b) uninterpretable cell (UIC); (c) probable HC; or (d) HC.
RESULTS: Among the TC+ patients, 30.6% and 25.9% experienced systemic relapse (SR) and breast cancer death (BCD), respectively, as compared with 13.3% and 8.5% of patients without TCs in the BM (survival analyses: P < 0.001, log-rank). The SR and BCD rate was 19.7% and 15.8% for TC-/UIC+ patients versus 12.5% and 7.4% for TC-/UIC- patients. Survival analyses confirmed that the UIC+ group contained clinically significant cells (P = 0.018, log-rank). No difference in clinical outcome was observed, regardless of whether probable HCs or HCs were present. Analyzing the number of ITC+ cells, SR and BCD occurred in 12.4% and 7.4% of patients with 0 ITCs present, 21.3% and 18.5% of patients with 1 ITC present, 19.4% and 16.7% of patients with 2 ITCs present, and 42.5% and 32.5% of patients with > or = 3 ITCs present.
CONCLUSIONS: Morphological categorization of ICC+ cells improves the clinical value of ITC detection in the BM. The presence of only one ITC reduces survival, and a greater number of ITCs further aggravates the prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131048     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  18 in total

1.  Inhibition of skeletal metastasis by ectopic ERalpha expression in ERalpha-negative human breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Abhik Bandyopadhyay; Long Wang; Shiau Hui Chin; Lu-Zhe Sun
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 2.  Circulating tumor cells: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Marija Balic; Anthony Williams; Henry Lin; Ram Datar; Richard J Cote
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Comparison of bone marrow, disseminated tumour cells and blood-circulating tumour cells in breast cancer patients after primary treatment.

Authors:  M J Slade; R Payne; S Riethdorf; B Ward; S A A Zaidi; J Stebbing; C Palmieri; H D Sinnett; E Kulinskaya; T Pitfield; R T McCormack; K Pantel; R C Coombes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients and noncancer donors.

Authors:  David N Krag; Roberto Kusminsky; Edward Manna; Donald Weaver; Seth P Harlow; Michael Covelli; Mary A Stanley; Laurence McCahill; Frank Ittleman; Bruce Leavitt; Martin Krag; Patricia Amarante
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-10

5.  Persistent tumor cells in bone marrow of non-metastatic breast cancer patients after primary surgery are associated with inferior outcome.

Authors:  Kjersti Tjensvoll; Satu Oltedal; Reino Heikkilä; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Bjørnar Gilje; James M Reuben; Rune Smaaland; Oddmund Nordgård
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Presence of apoptotic and nonapoptotic disseminated tumor cells reflects the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Tanja Fehm; Sven Becker; Graziella Becker-Pergola; Karl Sotlar; Gerhard Gebauer; Silke Dürr-Störzer; Hans Neubauer; Diethelm Wallwiener; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 7.  Bone marrow micrometastases and circulating tumor cells: current aspects and future perspectives.

Authors:  Volkmar Müller; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Clinical relevance and current challenges of research on disseminating tumor cells in cancer patients.

Authors:  Sabine Riethdorf; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Disseminated tumor cells as selection marker and monitoring tool for secondary adjuvant treatment in early breast cancer. Descriptive results from an intervention study.

Authors:  Marit Synnestvedt; Elin Borgen; Erik Wist; Gro Wiedswang; Kjetil Weyde; Terje Risberg; Christian Kersten; Ingvil Mjaaland; Lise Vindi; Cecilie Schirmer; Jahn Martin Nesland; Bjørn Naume
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer: review of detection methods, prognostic impact and biological issues.

Authors:  A Vincent-Salomon; F C Bidard; J Y Pierga
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.