Literature DB >> 15131033

Plasma etoposide catechol increases in pediatric patients undergoing multiple-day chemotherapy with etoposide.

Naiyu Zheng1, Carolyn A Felix, Shaokun Pang, Ray Boston, Peter Moate, Jennifer Scavuzzo, Ian A Blair.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to determine inter- and intrapatient differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of etoposide and its genotoxic catechol metabolite during conventional multiple-day dosing of etoposide in pediatric patients. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Seven pediatric patients with various malignancies received etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) i.v. over 1 h daily for 5 days. Blood samples were taken at selected time points on days 1 and 5. Plasma and protein-free plasma concentrations of etoposide and etoposide catechol were determined using a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters of both etoposide and etoposide catechol were calculated using the WinSAAM modeling program developed at NIH.
RESULTS: The mean maximum concentration (C(max)) for total (0.262 +/- 0.107 micro g/ml) and free catechol (0.0186 +/- 0.0082 micro g/ml) on day 5 were higher than the mean C(max) for total (0.114 +/- 0.028 micro g/ml) and free catechol (0.0120 +/- 0.0091 micro g/ml) on day 1. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)(24h) for total (105.4 +/- 49.1 micro g.min/ml) and free catechol (4.89 +/- 2.23 micro g x min/ml) on day 5 were much greater (P < 0.05) than those for total (55.9 +/- 16.1 micro g x min/ml) and free catechol (3.04 +/- 1.04 micro g x min/ml) on day 1. In contrast, the AUC(24h) for etoposide was slightly lower on day 5 than on day 1.
CONCLUSIONS: The C(max) and AUC(24h) for etoposide catechol were significantly higher on day 5 than on day 1. This suggests that metabolism of etoposide to its catechol metabolite increases in pediatric patients receiving multiple-day bolus etoposide infusions. These findings may be relevant to future reduction of the risk of leukemia as a treatment complication, because etoposide and etoposide catechol are both genotoxins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131033     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  6 in total

1.  Myeloperoxidase-dependent oxidation of etoposide in human myeloid progenitor CD34+ cells.

Authors:  Irina I Vlasova; Wei-Hong Feng; Julie P Goff; Angela Giorgianni; Duc Do; Susanne M Gollin; Dale W Lewis; Valerian E Kagan; Jack C Yalowich
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  8-Oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine as a biomarker of tobacco-smoking-induced oxidative stress.

Authors:  Clementina Mesaros; Jasbir S Arora; Ashley Wholer; Anil Vachani; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Etoposide quinone is a redox-dependent topoisomerase II poison.

Authors:  David A Jacob; Susan L Mercer; Neil Osheroff; Joseph E Deweese
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Topoisomerase II and leukemia.

Authors:  Maryjean Pendleton; R Hunter Lindsey; Carolyn A Felix; David Grimwade; Neil Osheroff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Myeloperoxidase Enhances Etoposide and Mitoxantrone-Mediated DNA Damage: A Target for Myeloprotection in Cancer Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mandeep Atwal; Emma L Lishman; Caroline A Austin; Ian G Cowell
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Analysis of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine in cellular DNA during oxidative stress.

Authors:  Dipti Mangal; Daljit Vudathala; Jong-Heum Park; Seon Hwa Lee; Trevor M Penning; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.739

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.