Literature DB >> 15130936

Distribution of information in biomedical abstracts and full-text publications.

M J Schuemie1, M Weeber, B J A Schijvenaars, E M van Mulligen, C C van der Eijk, R Jelier, B Mons, J A Kors.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Full-text documents potentially hold more information than their abstracts, but require more resources for processing. We investigated the added value of full text over abstracts in terms of information content and occurrences of gene symbol--gene name combinations that can resolve gene-symbol ambiguity.
RESULTS: We analyzed a set of 3902 biomedical full-text articles. Different keyword measures indicate that information density is highest in abstracts, but that the information coverage in full texts is much greater than in abstracts. Analysis of five different standard sections of articles shows that the highest information coverage is located in the results section. Still, 30-40% of the information mentioned in each section is unique to that section. Only 30% of the gene symbols in the abstract are accompanied by their corresponding names, and a further 8% of the gene names are found in the full text. In the full text, only 18% of the gene symbols are accompanied by their gene names.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15130936     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  25 in total

1.  Dynamic programming re-ranking for PPI interactor and pair extraction in full-text articles.

Authors:  Richard Tzong-Han Tsai; Po-Ting Lai
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  LINNAEUS: a species name identification system for biomedical literature.

Authors:  Martin Gerner; Goran Nenadic; Casey M Bergman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Text mining for modeling of protein complexes enhanced by machine learning.

Authors:  Varsha D Badal; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  LAITOR--Literature Assistant for Identification of Terms co-Occurrences and Relationships.

Authors:  Adriano Barbosa-Silva; Theodoros G Soldatos; Ivan L F Magalhães; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Jean-Fred Fontaine; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Reinhard Schneider; J Miguel Ortega
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Identification and analysis of co-occurrence networks with NetCutter.

Authors:  Heiko Müller; Francesco Mancuso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  BioCause: Annotating and analysing causality in the biomedical domain.

Authors:  Claudiu Mihăilă; Tomoko Ohta; Sampo Pyysalo; Sophia Ananiadou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Do peers see more in a paper than its authors?

Authors:  Anna Divoli; Preslav Nakov; Marti A Hearst
Journal:  Adv Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-11-27

8.  Disclosing ambiguous gene aliases by automatic literature profiling.

Authors:  Roney S Coimbra; Dana E Vanderwall; Guilherme C Oliveira
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Automated Patent Categorization and Guided Patent Search using IPC as Inspired by MeSH and PubMed.

Authors:  Daniel Eisinger; George Tsatsaronis; Markus Bundschus; Ulrich Wieneke; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  Is searching full text more effective than searching abstracts?

Authors:  Jimmy Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.