Literature DB >> 15130836

Comparative modelling: an essential methodology for protein structure prediction in the post-genomic era.

Bruno Contreras-Moreira1, Paul W Fitzjohn, Paul A Bates.   

Abstract

The gap between the number of protein sequences and protein structures is increasing rapidly, exacerbated by the completion of numerous genome projects now flooding into public databases. To fill this gap, comparative protein modelling is widely considered the most accurate technique for predicting the three-dimensional shape of proteins. High-throughput, automatic protein modelling should considerably increase our access to protein structures other than those determined by experimental techniques such as X-ray crystallography and NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy. The uses for these complete three-dimensional models are growing rapidly, ranging from guiding site-directed mutagenesis experiments to protein-protein interaction predictions. In recognition of this, a number of very useful comparative modelling servers have begun to emerge on the Web. Molecular biologists now have a powerful web-based toolkit to construct models, assess their accuracy, and use them to explain and predict experiments. There is, however, still much to do by those engaged in algorithmic development if comparative modelling is to compete on an equal footing with experimental protein structure determination techniques.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 15130836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1175-5636


  9 in total

1.  Fold assessment for comparative protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Discovery of catalases in members of the Chlamydiales order.

Authors:  Brigida Rusconi; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Three-dimensional structure of the catalytic domain of the yeast beta-(1,3)-glucan transferase Gas1: a molecular modeling investigation.

Authors:  Elena Papaleo; Piercarlo Fantucci; Marina Vai; Luca De Gioia
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Heterotypic humoral and cellular immune responses following Norwalk virus infection.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindesmith; Eric Donaldson; Juan Leon; Christine L Moe; Jeffrey A Frelinger; Robert E Johnston; David J Weber; Ralph S Baric
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  In silico pathway reconstruction: Iron-sulfur cluster biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Rui Alves; Albert Sorribas
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2007-01-31

6.  Modelface: an Application Programming Interface (API) for Homology Modeling Studies Using Modeller Software.

Authors:  Amirhossein Sakhteman; Bijan Zare
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.696

7.  Synthesis, Molecular Docking, and Antimycotic Evaluation of Some 3-Acyl Imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidines.

Authors:  Omar Gómez-García; Dulce Andrade-Pavón; Elena Campos-Aldrete; Ricardo Ballinas-Indilí; Alfonso Méndez-Tenorio; Lourdes Villa-Tanaca; Cecilio Álvarez-Toledano
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Genome-wide promoter analysis, homology modeling and protein interaction network of Dehydration Responsive Element Binding (DREB) gene family in Solanum tuberosum.

Authors:  Qurat-Ul Ain-Ali; Nida Mushtaq; Rabia Amir; Alvina Gul; Muhammad Tahir; Faiza Munir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mechanisms of GII.4 norovirus persistence in human populations.

Authors:  Lisa C Lindesmith; Eric F Donaldson; Anna D Lobue; Jennifer L Cannon; Du-Ping Zheng; Jan Vinje; Ralph S Baric
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.069

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.