OBJECTIVES: To study the attitudes and personal experiences with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) use in pharmacy students. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: University School of Pharmacy. METHODS: Pharmacy students were asked 17 questions according to an anonymous survey questionnaire. RESULTS: All 91 students (46% males) participated in the survey. The attitude toward TCM use was positive in 40%, neutral in 59% and negative in only 1%. On scales from 0 to 10, the mean (SD) scores for the adequacy of the current curriculum in TCM training and state of TCM knowledge were 3.2 (2.0) and 3.6 (1.6), respectively. Of the 35 participants who had used TCM in the past year, nearly half did so without any TCM practitioner consultation. Seventy-four percent reported that they had not been told of any side effects of TCM. When comparing the third year with first or second year students, there was no significant difference between any of these findings. CONCLUSION: The training in TCM within this 3-year pharmacy curriculum appears inadequate. Most students are not aware of any possible side effects in TCM. The attitude and practice do not appear to vary significantly between successive year of pharmacy students.
OBJECTIVES: To study the attitudes and personal experiences with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) use in pharmacy students. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: University School of Pharmacy. METHODS: Pharmacy students were asked 17 questions according to an anonymous survey questionnaire. RESULTS: All 91 students (46% males) participated in the survey. The attitude toward TCM use was positive in 40%, neutral in 59% and negative in only 1%. On scales from 0 to 10, the mean (SD) scores for the adequacy of the current curriculum in TCM training and state of TCM knowledge were 3.2 (2.0) and 3.6 (1.6), respectively. Of the 35 participants who had used TCM in the past year, nearly half did so without any TCM practitioner consultation. Seventy-four percent reported that they had not been told of any side effects of TCM. When comparing the third year with first or second year students, there was no significant difference between any of these findings. CONCLUSION: The training in TCM within this 3-year pharmacy curriculum appears inadequate. Most students are not aware of any possible side effects in TCM. The attitude and practice do not appear to vary significantly between successive year of pharmacy students.
Authors: Vincent Chi Ho Chung; Chun Hong Lau; Frank Wan Kin Chan; Joyce Hoi Sze You; Eliza Lai Yi Wong; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Sian Meryl Griffiths Journal: Chin Med Date: 2010-12-10 Impact factor: 5.455
Authors: Ryan B Abbott; Ka-Kit Hui; Ron D Hays; Jess Mandel; Michael Goldstein; Babbi Winegarden; Dale Glaser; Laurence Brunton Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Syed S Hasan; Chew S Yong; Muneer G Babar; Cho M Naing; Abdul Hameed; Mirza R Baig; Shahid M Iqbal; Therese Kairuz Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Jean H Kim; Elizabeth M S Kwong; Vincent C H Chung; John C O Lee; Terry Wong; William B Goggins Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.659