Literature DB >> 15130247

Analysis of sparse representation and blind source separation.

Yuanqing Li1, Andrzej Cichocki, Shun-ichi Amari.   

Abstract

In this letter, we analyze a two-stage cluster-then-l(1)-optimization approach for sparse representation of a data matrix, which is also a promising approach for blind source separation (BSS) in which fewer sensors than sources are present. First, sparse representation (factorization) of a data matrix is discussed. For a given overcomplete basis matrix, the corresponding sparse solution (coefficient matrix) with minimum l(1) norm is unique with probability one, which can be obtained using a standard linear programming algorithm. The equivalence of the l(1)-norm solution and the l(0)-norm solution is also analyzed according to a probabilistic framework. If the obtained l(1)-norm solution is sufficiently sparse, then it is equal to the l(0)-norm solution with a high probability. Furthermore, the l(1)- norm solution is robust to noise, but the l(0)-norm solution is not, showing that the l(1)-norm is a good sparsity measure. These results can be used as a recoverability analysis of BSS, as discussed. The basis matrix in this article is estimated using a clustering algorithm followed by normalization, in which the matrix columns are the cluster centers of normalized data column vectors. Zibulevsky, Pearlmutter, Boll, and Kisilev (2000) used this kind of two-stage approach in underdetermined BSS. Our recoverability analysis shows that this approach can deal with the situation in which the sources are overlapped to some degree in the analyzed domain and with the case in which the source number is unknown. It is also robust to additive noise and estimation error in the mixing matrix. Finally, four simulation examples and an EEG data analysis example are presented to illustrate the algorithm's utility and demonstrate its performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15130247     DOI: 10.1162/089976604773717586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  9 in total

1.  Adaptive sparse coding based on memristive neural network with applications.

Authors:  Xun Ji; Xiaofang Hu; Yue Zhou; Zhekang Dong; Shukai Duan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Characterization of task-free and task-performance brain states via functional connectome patterns.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Lei Guo; Xiang Li; Tuo Zhang; Dajiang Zhu; Kaiming Li; Hanbo Chen; Jinglei Lv; Changfeng Jin; Qun Zhao; Lingjiang Li; Tianming Liu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  A mixture model with a reference-based automatic selection of components for disease classification from protein and/or gene expression levels.

Authors:  Ivica Kopriva; Marko Filipović
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Sparse representation of brain aging: extracting covariance patterns from structural MRI.

Authors:  Longfei Su; Lubin Wang; Fanglin Chen; Hui Shen; Baojuan Li; Dewen Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An improved sparse representation model with structural information for Multicolour Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (M-FISH) image classification.

Authors:  Jingyao Li; Dongdong Lin; Hongbao Cao; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-10-23

6.  Integrating fMRI and SNP data for biomarker identification for schizophrenia with a sparse representation based variable selection method.

Authors:  Hongbao Cao; Junbo Duan; Dongdong Lin; Vince Calhoun; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Comparison of Support-Vector Machine and Sparse Representation Using a Modified Rule-Based Method for Automated Myocardial Ischemia Detection.

Authors:  Yi-Li Tseng; Keng-Sheng Lin; Fu-Shan Jaw
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Diagnosis of Compound Fault Using Sparsity Promoted-Based Sparse Component Analysis.

Authors:  Yansong Hao; Liuyang Song; Yanliang Ke; Huaqing Wang; Peng Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Sparse representation based biomarker selection for schizophrenia with integrated analysis of fMRI and SNPs.

Authors:  Hongbao Cao; Junbo Duan; Dongdong Lin; Yin Yao Shugart; Vince Calhoun; Yu-Ping Wang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.