Literature DB >> 15130159

Maternal obesity as an independent risk factor for caesarean delivery.

Eyal Sheiner1, Amalia Levy, Tehillah S Menes, Daniel Silverberg, Miriam Katz, Moshe Mazor.   

Abstract

The present study was aimed to investigate pregnancy outcome among obese women and specifically the correlation between maternal obesity and incidence of caesarean section (CS) while controlling for the potential confounding effects of other variables associated with obesity. A population-based study was performed comparing all pregnancies of obese (maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or more) and non-obese patients, between the years 1988 and 2002. Patients with hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus as well as patients lacking prenatal care were excluded from the analysis. Stratified analyses, using the Mantel-Haenszel technique, and a multiple logistic regression model were performed to control for confounders. During the study period there were 126,080 deliveries meeting the inclusion criteria, of which 1769 (1.4%) occurred in obese patients. Using a multivariable analysis, the following conditions were significantly associated with maternal obesity: failure to progress during the first stage (odds ratio (OR) = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5, 3.8; P < 0.001), fertility treatments (OR = 2.0; [95% CI 1.6, 2.5]; P < 0.001), previous CS (OR = 1.7; [95% CI 1.5, 1.9]; P < 0.001), malpresentations (OR = 1.4; [95% CI 1.2, 1.6]; P < 0.001), recurrent miscarriages (OR = 1.4; [95% CI 1.2, 1.7]; P < 0.001) and fetal macrosomia (OR = 1.4; [95% CI 1.2, 1.7]; P < 0.001). Higher rates of caesarean deliveries were found among obese parturients (27.8% vs. 10.8%; OR = 3.2; [95% CI 2.9, 3.5]; P < 0.001). When controlling for possible confounders, using the Mantel-Haenszel technique, the association between maternal obesity and CS remained significant. No significant differences were noted between the groups regarding perinatal complications such as perinatal mortality, congenital malformations, shoulder dystocia and low Apgar scores. In conclusion, a significant association was found between obesity and CS even after the exclusion of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus. Importantly, obesity alone was not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Obstetricians should be encouraged to allow obese patients not suffering from diabetes or hypertensive disorders an adequate trial of labour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15130159     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  34 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome in patients following different types of bariatric surgeries.

Authors:  Eyal Sheiner; Evgenia Balaban; Jacob Dreiher; Isaac Levi; Amalia Levy
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The association of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity with delivery outcomes: a comparison of immigrant and non-immigrant women in Berlin, Germany.

Authors:  Katharina Reiss; Jürgen Breckenkamp; Theda Borde; Silke Brenne; Wolfgang Henrich; Matthias David; Oliver Razum
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Condensation: A Retrospective Cohort Study to Investigate the Association Between Maternal Pre-pregnancy Obesity and Childhood Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Nofar Bar-Noy; Eyal Sheiner; Tamar Wainstock; Roy Kessous
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route.

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Paul Vanveldhuisen; Judith Hibbard; Helain Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Lee Learman; Isabelle Wilkins; Jennifer Bailit; Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly Gregory; Christos Hatjis; Matthew Hoffman; Mildred Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Modifiable risk factors in the first 1000 days for subsequent risk of childhood overweight in an Asian cohort: significance of parental overweight status.

Authors:  I M Aris; J Y Bernard; L-W Chen; M T Tint; W W Pang; S E Soh; S-M Saw; L P-C Shek; K M Godfrey; P D Gluckman; Y-S Chong; F Yap; M S Kramer; Y S Lee
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index.

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek; Jun Zhang; Paul Vanveldhuisen; James Troendle; Julie Beaver; Judith U Hibbard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Body mass index has a greater impact on pregnancy outcomes than gestational hyperglycaemia.

Authors:  W Ricart; J López; J Mozas; A Pericot; M A Sancho; N González; M Balsells; R Luna; A Cortázar; P Navarro; O Ramírez; B Flández; L F Pallardo; A Hernández-Mijas; J Ampudia; J M Fernández-Real; R Corcoy
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Diabetes in pregnancy: timing and mode of delivery.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Monica Piccoli; Sara Parolin; Stefano Restaino; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  The effects of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  A S Khashan; L C Kenny
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Overweight and Obesity before, during and after Pregnancy: Part 2: Evidence-based Risk Factors and Interventions.

Authors:  B Arabin; J H Stupin
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.