Literature DB >> 15129474

The collaborative method. A strategy for improving Australian general practice.

Andrew Knight1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United Kingdom National Primary Care Collaborative (NPCC) is said to be the largest health service improvement project in the world. The 2000 practices participating serve 11.5 million patients throughout the UK. Improvements such as a 60% reduction in waiting times to see a general practitioner and a four-fold reduction in coronary heart disease mortality have drawn the attention of policy makers in Australia. In 2003, I accompanied a group of Australians to Manchester in the UK to participate in an international training course in collaboratives hosted by the NPCC. The Australian government has recently called for tenders to run the Australian Primary Care Collaborative (APCC) program.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the NPCC and discuss how the methodology could be adapted and applied to Australia. DISCUSSION: The Australian primary health care system faces challenges in application of evidence to patient care. Collaborative methodology warrants consideration to address these. Differences including distance, business issues, remuneration mechanisms, infrastructure deficiencies and clinician cynicism present challenges in adaptation and application to Australia. Given adequate support, an APCC could empower general practices to continue to make improvements in many areas of activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  7 in total

1.  Publish and perish: a case study of publication ethics in a rural community.

Authors:  J Fraser; C Alexander
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The arthritis and musculoskeletal quality improvement program (amquip): a breakthrough series methodology project.

Authors:  I Mastura
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2008-08-31

3.  Computer assisted chronic disease management: does it work? A pilot study using mixed methods.

Authors:  Kay M Jones; Ruby Biezen; Leon Piterman
Journal:  ISRN Family Med       Date:  2013-03-07

4.  Informing implementation of quality improvement in Australian primary care.

Authors:  Charlotte Hespe; Lucie Rychetnik; David Peiris; Mark Harris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Findings and lessons learnt implementing a cardiovascular disease quality improvement program in Australian primary care: a mixed method evaluation.

Authors:  C M Hespe; K Giskes; M F Harris; D Peiris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Learning from the implementation of a quality improvement intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative analysis of participants views of a CVD preventive care project.

Authors:  C M Hespe; E Brown; L Rychetnik
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Healthcare improvement as planned system change or complex responsive processes? a longitudinal case study in general practice.

Authors:  Barbara J Booth; Nicholas Zwar; Mark F Harris
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.