Literature DB >> 15129279

Convergent evolution in mechanical design of lamnid sharks and tunas.

Jeanine M Donley1, Chugey A Sepulveda, Peter Konstantinidis, Sven Gemballa, Robert E Shadwick.   

Abstract

The evolution of 'thunniform' body shapes in several different groups of vertebrates, including whales, ichthyosaurs and several species of large pelagic fishes supports the view that physical and hydromechanical demands provided important selection pressures to optimize body design for locomotion during vertebrate evolution. Recognition of morphological similarities between lamnid sharks (the most well known being the great white and the mako) and tunas has led to a general expectation that they also have converged in their functional design; however, no quantitative data exist on the mechanical performance of the locomotor system in lamnid sharks. Here we examine the swimming kinematics, in vivo muscle dynamics and functional morphology of the force-transmission system in a lamnid shark, and show that the evolutionary convergence in body shape and mechanical design between the distantly related lamnids and tunas is much more than skin deep; it extends to the depths of the myotendinous architecture and the mechanical basis for propulsive movements. We demonstrate that not only have lamnids and tunas converged to a much greater extent than previously known, but they have also developed morphological and functional adaptations in their locomotor systems that are unlike virtually all other fishes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129279     DOI: 10.1038/nature02435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  27 in total

1.  Convergent evolution as natural experiment: the tape of life reconsidered.

Authors:  Russell Powell; Carlos Mariscal
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Stepwise enforcement of the notochord and its intersection with the myoseptum: an evolutionary path leading to development of the vertebra?

Authors:  Sindre Grotmol; Harald Kryvi; Roger Keynes; Christel Krossøy; Kari Nordvik; Geir K Totland
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The rate of metabolism in marine animals: environmental constraints, ecological demands and energetic opportunities.

Authors:  Brad A Seibel; Jeffrey C Drazen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The predictability of evolution: glimpses into a post-Darwinian world.

Authors:  Simon Conway Morris
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-09-23

5.  Whether depositing fat or losing weight, fish maintain a balance.

Authors:  Ole Brix; Renate Grüner; Ivar Rønnestad; Sven Gemballa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Comparative analyses of animal-tracking data reveal ecological significance of endothermy in fishes.

Authors:  Yuuki Y Watanabe; Kenneth J Goldman; Jennifer E Caselle; Demian D Chapman; Yannis P Papastamatiou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Caudal fin allometry in the white shark Carcharodon carcharias: implications for locomotory performance and ecology.

Authors:  Theagarten Lingham-Soliar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-17

Review 8.  Red muscle function in stiff-bodied swimmers: there and almost back again.

Authors:  Douglas A Syme; Robert E Shadwick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Hydraulic control of tuna fins: A role for the lymphatic system in vertebrate locomotion.

Authors:  Vadim Pavlov; Benyamin Rosental; Nathaniel F Hansen; Jody M Beers; George Parish; Ian Rowbotham; Barbara A Block
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Ecological and morphological traits predict depth-generalist fishes on coral reefs.

Authors:  Tom C L Bridge; Osmar J Luiz; Richard R Coleman; Corinne N Kane; Randall K Kosaki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.