Literature DB >> 15129008

Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality.

William V Holt1, Katrien J W Van Look.   

Abstract

Stringent selection mechanisms, in both internal and external fertilisation systems, reject all but a significant minority of the spermatozoa released at ejaculation. Sperm competition theory provides circumstantial evidence that the selection process involves mechanisms by which the quality of the fertilising spermatozoon is controlled, thereby ensuring that females and their offspring receive high quality genetic material. In this review we examine some of these selection processes to see whether they could be exploited for the improvement of laboratory tests of sperm quality. Such tests are not only required for clinical and agricultural purposes, but are increasingly needed in fields such as reproductive and environmental toxicology where the species requirement is much broader. Despite many years of research, sperm quality assessment methods continue to provide imprecise data about fertility; here we suggest that this may be a consequence of using tests that focus on the spermatozoa that would normally be unable to fertilise under natural conditions. To achieve fertilisation a spermatozoon must be capable of responding appropriately to external signalling stimuli; those involving protein kinase-regulated flagellar function seem especially influential in governing effects ranging from non-Mendelian inheritance in mammals to sperm chemotaxis in sea urchins. Examination of the elicited responses reveals considerable heterogeneity in all species. Here we propose that this level of heterogeneity is meaningful both in terms of understanding how spermatozoa from some individuals possess fertility advantages over spermatozoa from their rivals in sperm competition, and in that the heterogeneity should be exploitable in the development of more accurate laboratory tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15129008     DOI: 10.1530/rep.1.00134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  27 in total

Review 1.  Collective dynamics of sperm cells.

Authors:  Simon F Schoeller; William V Holt; Eric E Keaveny
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Haploid selection within a single ejaculate increases offspring fitness.

Authors:  Ghazal Alavioon; Cosima Hotzy; Khriezhanuo Nakhro; Sandra Rudolf; Douglas G Scofield; Susanne Zajitschek; Alexei A Maklakov; Simone Immler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Selection against spermatozoa with fragmented DNA after postovulatory mating depends on the type of damage.

Authors:  Juan D Hourcade; Miriam Pérez-Crespo; Raúl Fernández-González; Belén Pintado; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-01-31       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: the footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion.

Authors:  Timothy R Dreszer; Gregory D Wall; David Haussler; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Sperm cryopreservation of a live-bearing fish, Xiphophorus couchianus: male-to-male variation in post-thaw motility and production of F(1) hybrid offspring.

Authors:  Huiping Yang; Leona Hazlewood; Ronald B Walter; Terrence R Tiersch
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.228

6.  Development of a simplified and standardized protocol with potential for high-throughput for sperm cryopreservation in zebrafish Danio rerio.

Authors:  Huiping Yang; Carrie Carmichael; Zoltan M Varga; Terrence R Tiersch
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Not all sperm are equal: functional mitochondria characterize a subpopulation of human sperm with better fertilization potential.

Authors:  Ana Paula Sousa; Alexandra Amaral; Marta Baptista; Renata Tavares; Pedro Caballero Campo; Pedro Caballero Peregrín; Albertina Freitas; Artur Paiva; Teresa Almeida-Santos; João Ramalho-Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Evolutionary consequences of environmental effects on gamete performance.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Simone Immler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

9.  Genetic and potential non-genetic benefits increase offspring fitness of polyandrous females in non-resource based mating system.

Authors:  Jukka Kekäläinen; Geir Rudolfsen; Matti Janhunen; Lars Figenschou; Nina Peuhkuri; Niina Tamper; Raine Kortet
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Sperm variation within a single ejaculate affects offspring development in Atlantic salmon.

Authors:  Simone Immler; Cosima Hotzy; Ghazal Alavioon; Erik Petersson; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.