Literature DB >> 15128961

The partners in care approach to ethics outcomes in quality improvement programs for depression.

Jodi Halpern1, Megan Dwight Johnson, Jeanne Miranda, Kenneth B Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient centeredness and equity are major quality goals, but little is known about how these goals are affected by efforts to improve the quality of care. The authors describe an approach to addressing these goals in a randomized trial of quality improvement for depressed primary care patients.
METHODS: For four ethics goals (autonomy, distributive justice, beneficence, and avoiding harm), the authors identify intervention features, study measures, and hypotheses implemented in Partners in Care, a randomized trial of two quality improvement interventions, relative to usual care and summarize published findings pertinent to these outcomes.
RESULTS: To implement an ethics framework, modifications were required in study design and in measures and analysis plans, particularly to address the autonomy and justice goals. Extra resources were needed for sample recruitment, for intervention and survey materials, and to fund an ethics coinvestigator. The interventions were associated with improvements in all four ethics areas. Patients who received the interventions were significantly more likely to receive the treatment they had indicated at baseline as their preferred treatment (autonomy goal). Intervention-associated benefits occurred more rapidly among sicker patients and extended to patients from ethnic minority groups, resulting in a reduction in ethnic-group disparities in health outcomes relative to usual care (distributive justice goal). The interventions were associated with improved quality of care and health outcomes (beneficence goal) and with reduced use of long-term minor tranquilizers (goal of avoiding harm).
CONCLUSION: S: It is feasible to explicitly address ethics outcomes in quality improvement programs for depression, but substantial marginal resources may be required. Nevertheless, interventions so modified can increase a practice's ability to realize ethics goals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Mental Health Therapies

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15128961     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.55.5.532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Serv        ISSN: 1075-2730            Impact factor:   3.084


  5 in total

1.  The National Clinician Scholars Program: Teaching Transformational Leadership and Promoting Health Justice Through Community-Engaged Research Ethics.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bromley; Loretta Jones; Marjorie S Rosenthal; Michele Heisler; Julie A Sochalski; Deborah Koniak-Griffin; Cristina Punzalan; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 2.  Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Vikki A Entwistle; Abi Eccles; Sara Ryan; Sasha Shepperd; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-03

3.  Collaborative depression care: history, evolution and ways to enhance dissemination and sustainability.

Authors:  Wayne Katon; Jürgen Unützer; Kenneth Wells; Loretta Jones
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.238

4.  Community-based partnered research: new directions in mental health services research.

Authors:  Margarita Alegría; Yuting Wong; Norah Mulvaney-Day; Anna Nillni; Enola Proctor; Michael Nickel; Loretta Jones; Bonnie Green; Paul Koegel; Aziza Wright; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Paradoxes of person-centred care: A discussion paper.

Authors:  Martina Summer Meranius; Inger K Holmström; Jakob Håkansson; Agneta Breitholtz; Farah Moniri; Sofia Skogevall; Karin Skoglund; Dara Rasoal
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-06-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.