BACKGROUND:N-Acetylcysteine has been shown to protect against contrast nephropathy, although the mechanisms underlying such an effect are unclear. Surprisingly, studies have shown that post-radiocontrast renal function actually improves in chronic renal failure patients receiving N-acetylcysteine. However, there have been no studies investigating the cause of this improvement. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients (aged 65+/-2 years) suffering from stable mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency and undergoing elective coronary angiography were randomized to receive either placebo or N-acetylcysteine. All received similar hydration. Renal function parameters were assessed 48 h before and 48 h after radiocontrast administration. Urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t), a specific marker of oxidative stress, was measured immediately before and after the procedure. Expression of urinary alpha-glutathione S-transferase protein, a specific proximal tubular injury marker, was assessed after the procedure. RESULTS: Comparing creatinine clearance values before and after angiography, a significant increase was seen in N-acetylcysteine patients (44.7+/-4.2 vs 57.2+/-6.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.02), whereas placebo patients presented no change (46.6+/-5.0 vs 46.9+/-4.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.90). After radiocontrast, urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t) levels in placebo patients increased significantly over baseline values (2.9+/-0.7 vs 10.3+/-2.1 ng/mg creatinine; P = 0.007), whereas urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t) levels in N-acetylcysteine patients remained basically unchanged (3.5+/-0.5 vs 4.1+/-0.9 ng/mg creatinine; P = 0.63). Furthermore, N-acetylcysteine treatment led to lower levels of alpha-glutathione S-transferase than did placebo treatment (0.8+/-0.2 vs 2.4+/-0.7 micro g/g; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In chronic renal failure patients, the improvement in renal function induced by post-radiocontrast administration of N-acetylcysteine is strongly associated with suppression of oxidant stress-mediated proximal tubular injury.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:N-Acetylcysteine has been shown to protect against contrast nephropathy, although the mechanisms underlying such an effect are unclear. Surprisingly, studies have shown that post-radiocontrast renal function actually improves in chronic renal failurepatients receiving N-acetylcysteine. However, there have been no studies investigating the cause of this improvement. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients (aged 65+/-2 years) suffering from stable mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency and undergoing elective coronary angiography were randomized to receive either placebo or N-acetylcysteine. All received similar hydration. Renal function parameters were assessed 48 h before and 48 h after radiocontrast administration. Urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t), a specific marker of oxidative stress, was measured immediately before and after the procedure. Expression of urinary alpha-glutathione S-transferase protein, a specific proximal tubular injury marker, was assessed after the procedure. RESULTS: Comparing creatinine clearance values before and after angiography, a significant increase was seen in N-acetylcysteinepatients (44.7+/-4.2 vs 57.2+/-6.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.02), whereas placebo patients presented no change (46.6+/-5.0 vs 46.9+/-4.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.90). After radiocontrast, urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t) levels in placebo patients increased significantly over baseline values (2.9+/-0.7 vs 10.3+/-2.1 ng/mg creatinine; P = 0.007), whereas urinary 15-isoprostane F2(t) levels in N-acetylcysteinepatients remained basically unchanged (3.5+/-0.5 vs 4.1+/-0.9 ng/mg creatinine; P = 0.63). Furthermore, N-acetylcysteine treatment led to lower levels of alpha-glutathione S-transferase than did placebo treatment (0.8+/-0.2 vs 2.4+/-0.7 micro g/g; P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: In chronic renal failurepatients, the improvement in renal function induced by post-radiocontrast administration of N-acetylcysteine is strongly associated with suppression of oxidant stress-mediated proximal tubular injury.
Authors: Indrani Sinha-Hikim; Ruoqing Shen; Wai-Nang N Paul Lee; Albert Crum; Nosratola D Vaziri; Keith C Norris Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Thomas M Kitzler; Aala Jaberi; Gerald Sendlhofer; Peter Rehak; Christian Binder; Eva Petnehazy; Rudolf Stacher; Peter Kotanko Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Luciana Pache de Faria Guimaraes; Antonio Carlos Seguro; Maria Heloisa Mazzola Shimizu; Letícia Aparecida Lopes Neri; Nairo Massakasu Sumita; Ana Carolina de Bragança; Rildo Aparecido Volpini; Talita Rojas Cunha Sanches; Fernanda Andrade Macaferri da Fonseca; Carlos Alberto Moreira Filho; Maria Helena Vaisbich Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: John W Simmons; Kevin K Chung; Evan M Renz; Christopher E White; Casey L Cotant; Molly A Tilley; Mark O Hardin; John A Jones; Lorne H Blackbourne; Steven E Wolf Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Steven D Weisbord; Martin Gallagher; James Kaufman; Alan Cass; Chirag R Parikh; Glenn M Chertow; Kendrick A Shunk; Peter A McCullough; Michael J Fine; Maria K Mor; Robert A Lew; Grant D Huang; Todd A Conner; Mary T Brophy; Joanne Lee; Susan Soliva; Paul M Palevsky Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 8.237