Literature DB >> 15128688

Implementation of brief alcohol interventions by nurses in primary care: do non-clinical factors influence practice?

Catherine A Lock1, Eileen F S Kaner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the UK, GPs and practice nurses selectively provide brief alcohol interventions to risk drinkers. GPs' provision of a brief alcohol intervention can be predicted by patient characteristics, practitioner characteristics and structural factors such as the features of the practice and how it is organized. However, much less is known about possible modifiers of nurse practice.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate if patient characteristics, nurse characteristics and practice factors influence provision of a brief alcohol intervention by practice nurses in primary health care.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight practice nurses who had implemented a brief alcohol intervention programme in a previous trial based in the North of England were requested to screen adults presenting to their surgery and follow a structured protocol to give a brief intervention (5 min of advice plus an information booklet) to all 'risk' drinkers. Anonymized carbon copies of 5541 completed Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) screening questionnaires were collected after a 3-month implementation period and analysed by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Although AUDIT identified 1500 'risk' drinkers, only 926 (62%) received a brief intervention. Logistic regression modelling showed that patients' risk status as measured by AUDIT score was the most influential predictor of a brief intervention by practice nurses. However, risk drinkers who were most likely to receive a brief intervention were male. Patients' age or social class did not independently predict a brief intervention. The multilevel model was unable to identify any independent nurse characteristics that could predict a brief intervention, but indicated significant variation between nurses in their tendency to offer the intervention to patients. No structural factors were found to be positively associated with selective provision.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and nurse factors contributed to the selective provision of a brief intervention in primary care. If patients are to experience the beneficial effects of a brief alcohol intervention, then there is a need to improve the accuracy of delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15128688     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  24 in total

Review 1.  Percent total attrition: a poor metric for study rigor in hosted intervention designs.

Authors:  K Rivet Amico
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Utility of prompting physicians for brief alcohol consumption intervention.

Authors:  Gail L Rose; Dennis A Plante; Colleen S Thomas; Laura J Denton; John E Helzer
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Automated screening for at-risk drinking in a primary care office using interactive voice response.

Authors:  Gail L Rose; Joan M Skelly; Gary J Badger; Charles D Maclean; Megan P Malgeri; John E Helzer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Steering Clear of Driving After Drinking: a Tailored e-Health Intervention for Reducing Repeat Offending and Modifying Alcohol Use in a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Hollie Jai Wilson; Gavan Palk; Mary Christina Sheehan; Darren Wishart; Barry Watson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10

5.  Interactive voice response technology can deliver alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care.

Authors:  Gail L Rose; Charles D MacLean; Joan Skelly; Gary J Badger; Tonya A Ferraro; John E Helzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to investigate facilitators and barriers of implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention among primary care health professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zixin Wang; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Paul Shing-Fong Chan; Yuan Fang; Martin Chi-Sang Wong; Junjie Huang
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Screening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Eileen Kaner; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Simon Coulton; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Judy Myles; Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Katherine Perryman; Tom Phillips; Don Shenker; Jonathan Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Evaluation of alcohol screening and brief intervention in routine practice of primary care nurses in Vhembe district, South Africa.

Authors:  Karl Peltzer; Gladys Matseke; Matevha Azwihangwisi
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  An exploration of how clinician attitudes and beliefs influence the implementation of lifestyle risk factor management in primary healthcare: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Rachel A Laws; Lynn A Kemp; Mark F Harris; Gawaine Powell Davies; Anna M Williams; Rosslyn Eames-Brown
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Explaining the variation in the management of lifestyle risk factors in primary health care: a multilevel cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rachel A Laws; Upali W Jayasinghe; Mark F Harris; Anna M Williams; Gawaine Powell Davies; Lynn A Kemp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.