Literature DB >> 15128638

Sedation with sufentanil in patients receiving pressure support ventilation has no effects on respiration: a pilot study.

Giorgio Conti1, Andrea Arcangeli, Massimo Antonelli, Franco Cavaliere, Roberta Costa, Francesca Simeoni, Rodolfo Proietti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of sedation with sufentanil on respiratory drive, respiratory pattern, and gas exchange of critically ill patients during pressure support ventilation.
METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we observed 12 adult patients receiving partial ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure. Each subject received a continuous infusion of sufentanil at 0.2 to 0.3 micro g x kg(-1) x hr(-1) to obtain a modified Ramsay sedation score between 2 and 3. In basal conditions and at variable distance from the beginning of the sufentanil infusion (10', 30', 60', 120', 24 hr) we evaluated gas exchange, hemodynamic variables, respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume (TV), respiratory pattern, respiratory drive (P0.1) and inspiratory impedance of the respiratory system [P0.1/TV/inspiratory time (Ti)].
RESULTS: The continuous iv administration of 0.2 to 0.3 micro g x kg(-1) x hr(-1) of sufentanil resulted in the desired level of sedation. No significant heart rate, heart rhythm and blood pressure changes were observed. Sufentanil infusion did not affect TV, minute volume, Ti/inspiratory duty cycle, RR, P0.1, P0.1/TV/Ti and gas exchange did not change significantly over the study period.
CONCLUSION: A continuous infusion of sufentanil induces "awake" sedation with no detectable effects on respiratory variables in critically ill patients during partial ventilatory support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15128638     DOI: 10.1007/BF03018315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  12 in total

1.  Impact of sedation and analgesia during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation on outcome: a marginal structural model causal analysis.

Authors:  Alfonso Muriel; Oscar Peñuelas; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Alejandro C Arroliga; Victor Abraira; Arnaud W Thille; Laurent Brochard; Nicolás Nin; Andrew R Davies; Pravin Amin; Bin Du; Konstantinos Raymondos; Fernando Rios; Damian A Violi; Salvatore M Maggiore; Marco Antonio Soares; Marco González; Fekri Abroug; Hans-Henrik Bülow; Javier Hurtado; Michael A Kuiper; Rui P Moreno; Amine Ali Zeggwagh; Asisclo J Villagómez; Manuel Jibaja; Luis Soto; Gabriel D'Empaire; Dimitrios Matamis; Younsuck Koh; Antonio Anzueto; Niall D Ferguson; Andrés Esteban
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Is sedation safe and beneficial in patients receiving NIV? No.

Authors:  Giorgio Conti; Nicholas S Hill; Stefano Nava
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Rescue treatment for noninvasive ventilation failure due to interface intolerance with remifentanil analgosedation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Monica Rocco; Giorgio Conti; Elisa Alessandri; Andrea Morelli; Gustavo Spadetta; Amalia Laderchi; Carmela Di Santo; Samanta Francavilla; Paolo Pietropaoli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Remifentanil-based sedation to treat noninvasive ventilation failure: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Constantin; Eric Schneider; Sophie Cayot-Constantin; Renaud Guerin; Francois Bannier; Emmanuel Futier; Jean-Etienne Bazin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The effect of sedation and/or analgesia as rescue treatment during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the patients with Interface intolerance after Extubation.

Authors:  Yue-Nan Ni; Ting Wang; He Yu; Bin-Miao Liang; Zong-An Liang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Effects of Propofol on Respiratory Drive and Patient-ventilator Synchrony during Pressure Support Ventilation in Postoperative Patients: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Ai-Ping Wu; Yi Yang; Song-Qiao Liu; Ying-Zi Huang; Jian-Feng Xie; Chun Pan; Cong-Shan Yang; Hai-Bo Qiu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  An Open-Label Study of Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet 30 Mcg in Patients with Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Jacob L Hutchins; David Leiman; Harold S Minkowitz; Maurice Jove; Karen P DiDonato; Pamela P Palmer
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Pressure support ventilation attenuates ventilator-induced protein modifications in the diaphragm.

Authors:  Emmanuel Futier; Jean-Michel Constantin; Lydie Combaret; Laurent Mosoni; Laurence Roszyk; Vincent Sapin; Didier Attaix; Boris Jung; Samir Jaber; Jean-Etienne Bazin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Dexmedetomidine-midazolam versus Sufentanil-midazolam for Awake Fiberoptic Nasotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-blind Study.

Authors:  Cheng-Wen Li; Yan-Dong Li; Hai-Tao Tian; Xian-Gang Kong; Kui Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Dexmedetomidine is effective and safe during NIV in infants and young children with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  M Piastra; A Pizza; S Gaddi; E Luca; O Genovese; E Picconi; D De Luca; G Conti
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 2.125

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.