Literature DB >> 1512837

The Raz bladder neck suspension: results in 206 patients.

S Raz1, E M Sussman, D B Erickson, K J Bregg, V W Nitti.   

Abstract

We reviewed the charts of 206 patients who underwent the Raz bladder neck suspension between January 1984 and June 1990 for stress urinary incontinence. Mean followup was 15 months. Overall, our results demonstrated a successful outcome (cure or rare stress urinary incontinence not requiring protection) in 186 of 206 patients (90.3%). Cox multivariant analysis showed that the only predictor of outcome was the degree of preoperative stress urinary incontinence (mild, moderate or severe, p less than 0.001). When the results were stratified by degree of incontinence preoperatively 20 of 21 patients (95%) with mild, 151 of 162 (93%) with moderate and 15 of 23 (65%) with severe incontinence had a successful outcome. No statistical correlation was found with patient age, number of prior operations, hysterectomy, urgency incontinence or menopause. For the patients who failed, the mean interval to recurrent stress urinary incontinence was 5 months. Significant urgency incontinence was present preoperatively in 58 of the 204 patients (29%), with postoperative resolution in 66%. De novo urgency incontinence occurred in 7.5%. Complications included secondary prolapse (6% of the patients), prolonged retention (2.5%) and suprapubic pain (3%). In summary, the Raz bladder neck suspension for correction of stress urinary incontinence has been successful in more than 90% of this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1512837     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36740-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  Modified insitu vaginal wall sling in stress incontinence.

Authors:  A Metin; O Kayigil; S I Ahmed
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The Bologna bladder neck suspension procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence associated with cystocele.

Authors:  P L Giacalone; F Laffargue; J P Daures; I Lombard
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

3.  The UCLA surgical approach to sphincteric incontinence in women.

Authors:  E S Rovner; D A Ginsberg; S Raz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Cindy L Amundsen; George D Webster
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-10

5.  Leakpoint pressures in female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J M Cummings
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

6.  Initial experience with the modified vaginal wall sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A K Batra; R Mathews; A Lopresti
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

7.  Our changing strategies on bladder neck suspension operations.

Authors:  O Kayigil
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  [A new approach to the transvaginal needle suspension technique after Raz. Technique and long-term results].

Authors:  I Gilja; R Deban; P Bokarica; Z Hrgovic; D Tomić; A Klobucar
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Clinical factors associated with low valsalva leak point pressure among women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Sun-Ouck Kim; Young Jung Kim; Dong Hoon Yoo; In Sang Hwang; Eu Chang Hwang; Seung Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dongdeuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial.

Authors:  F M Reid; A Elders; S Breeman; R M Freeman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 7.331

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.