Literature DB >> 15128127

Management of destructive bowel injury in the open abdomen.

Marco Chavarria-Aguilar1, William T Cockerham, Donald E Barker, David L Ciraulo, Charles M Richart, Robert A Maxwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little attention has been focused on destructive injuries of the bowel in patients requiring open abdominal management. We therefore reviewed our institutional experience for destructive bowel injury requiring open abdominal management with the vacuum pack technique (vac).
METHODS: The trauma registry at a Level I trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining destructive bowel injury for an 11-year period beginning in May 1990. Patients were assessed for pertinent clinical and demographic information, and individuals requiring open abdominal management were compared with those who did not.
RESULTS: One hundred four patients required bowel resection and constitute the study population. Twenty-nine patients had vacs placed, with 22 (75.9%) of the total eventually obtaining delayed fascial closure. Nineteen (183%) patients had resection and primary repair (PR) of large and/or small bowel in conjunction with a vac, 10 (9.6%) patients had stoma formation in conjunction with a vac, 62 (59.6%) patients had resection and PR of small and/or large bowel in conjunction with primary fascial closure, and 13 (12.5%) patients had stoma formation and primary fascial closure. There were no differences in abdominal abscess or leak rates between groups. There were four deaths, none of which was secondary to failure of an anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Bowel resection with PR appears to be a safe alternative after destructive bowel injury and results in acceptable morbidity when performed in conjunction with open abdominal management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15128127     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000115065.39699.6a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Late complications of open abdomen].

Authors:  F Eder; J Tautenhahn; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Evidence-based medicine: vacuum-assisted closure in wound care management.

Authors:  Judith E Hunter; Luc Teot; Raymond Horch; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  [Procedures of temporary wall closure in abdominal trauma and sepsis].

Authors:  S Lenz; D Doll; K Harder; A Lieber; U Müller; W Düsel; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy for children with an open abdomen.

Authors:  Ivan M Gutierrez; Gerald Gollin
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Intensive care and health outcomes of open abdominal treatment: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

Authors:  A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; C Jänig; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Comparison of Outcomes between Early Fascial Closure and Delayed Abdominal Closure in Patients with Open Abdomen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Jinning Ye; Wu Song; Jianhui Chen; Yujie Yuan; Jianan Ren
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 7.  Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen.

Authors:  Pieter Boele van Hensbroek; Jan Wind; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Olivier R C Busch; J Carel Goslings; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.