Aureli Torné1, Luis M Puig-Tintoré. 1. Section of Gynaecological Oncology, Clinical Institute of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy represent one of the most revolutionary advances in oncological surgery in recent years. In this review, the current state of sentinel node detection in gynaecological cancers and its use in vulvar and cervical cancer are assessed. RECENT FINDINGS: Since the recent clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for melanomas and breast cancer, there has been extensive research on the implementation of this technique to most solid neoplasias. Studies on the feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of inguinal nodes. The clinical implementation of the procedure requires validation and is under investigation. In the last two years, several pilot studies on the feasibility of lymphatic mapping/sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer have yielded promising results. There is minimal experience of its use in endometrial cancer. Detailed pathological study of a sentinel node biopsy with ultrastaging and immunohistochemical or polymerase chain reaction analyses can identify lymph node micrometastasis that conventional methods would identify as negative for metastatic disease. The best histopathological procedure for sentinel node biopsy, the clinical significance of micrometastases, and the appropriate management of such micrometastases are currently under investigation. SUMMARY: Sentinel node biopsy is one of the main research interests in gynaecological oncological surgery. At present there are not enough data to permit modification of current treatment protocols. Large and multi-institutional trials are required in order to define the implementation of sentinel node biopsy in clinical practice with the objective of achieving safer and more conservative surgery.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy represent one of the most revolutionary advances in oncological surgery in recent years. In this review, the current state of sentinel node detection in gynaecological cancers and its use in vulvar and cervical cancer are assessed. RECENT FINDINGS: Since the recent clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for melanomas and breast cancer, there has been extensive research on the implementation of this technique to most solid neoplasias. Studies on the feasibility of sentinel node biopsy in vulvar cancer have shown that the status of the sentinel node is an accurate predictor of the status of inguinal nodes. The clinical implementation of the procedure requires validation and is under investigation. In the last two years, several pilot studies on the feasibility of lymphatic mapping/sentinel node biopsy in cervical cancer have yielded promising results. There is minimal experience of its use in endometrial cancer. Detailed pathological study of a sentinel node biopsy with ultrastaging and immunohistochemical or polymerase chain reaction analyses can identify lymph node micrometastasis that conventional methods would identify as negative for metastatic disease. The best histopathological procedure for sentinel node biopsy, the clinical significance of micrometastases, and the appropriate management of such micrometastases are currently under investigation. SUMMARY: Sentinel node biopsy is one of the main research interests in gynaecological oncological surgery. At present there are not enough data to permit modification of current treatment protocols. Large and multi-institutional trials are required in order to define the implementation of sentinel node biopsy in clinical practice with the objective of achieving safer and more conservative surgery.
Authors: Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Angela Santoro; Italia Esposito; Giuseppe Angelico; Saveria Spadola; Gian Franco Zannoni Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: I Roca; A P Caresia; A Gil-Moreno; P Pifarre; S Aguade-Bruix; J Castell-Conesa; J M Martínez-Palones; J Xercavins Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-05-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Lluís María Puig-Tintoré; José Antonio Lejárcegui; Pilar Paredes; María Luisa Ortega; Antonio Muñoz; Jaume Ordi; Pere Fusté; Jaime Ortín; Joan Duch; Francisco Martín; Francesca Pons Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kalliopi I Pappa; Alexandros Rodolakis; Ioanna Christodoulou; Maria Gazouli; Sofia Markaki; Aris Antsaklis; Nicholas P Anagnou Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.411