PURPOSE: The antiemetic effectiveness of ondansetron 8 mg i.v, ondansetron 32 mg i.v, and granisetron 10 microg/kg or 1 mg i.v. as prophylaxis in breast cancer patients regimens was studied. METHODS: Data from six U.S. cancer centers were collected retrospectively for 224 patients who received cyclophosphamide-containing therapy between January 1998 and June 2002. Logistic-regression analysis was used to examine the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) both on an unadjusted basis and controlling for concomitant radiation therapy and dexamethasone use. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (34%) received ondansetron 32 mg, 68 (30%) received ondansetron 8 mg, and 80 (36%) received granisetron (either 10 microg/kg or 1 mg). Patients receiving ondansetron 8 mg were 2.5 times as likely to have CINV on an adjusted basis as granisetron recipients (p < 0.01). There was no increase in the risk of CINV with ondansetron 32 mg compared with granisetron. Patients treated with ondansetron 8 mg required more rescue antiemetics and more prophylactic antiemetics in subsequent chemotherapy cycles than patients in the other groups. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective multicenter study, granisetron 1 mg or 10 microg/kg and ondansetron 32 mg appeared more effective than ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute CINV related to cyclophosphamide therapy.
PURPOSE: The antiemetic effectiveness of ondansetron 8 mg i.v, ondansetron 32 mg i.v, and granisetron 10 microg/kg or 1 mg i.v. as prophylaxis in breast cancerpatients regimens was studied. METHODS: Data from six U.S. cancer centers were collected retrospectively for 224 patients who received cyclophosphamide-containing therapy between January 1998 and June 2002. Logistic-regression analysis was used to examine the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) both on an unadjusted basis and controlling for concomitant radiation therapy and dexamethasone use. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (34%) received ondansetron 32 mg, 68 (30%) received ondansetron 8 mg, and 80 (36%) received granisetron (either 10 microg/kg or 1 mg). Patients receiving ondansetron 8 mg were 2.5 times as likely to have CINV on an adjusted basis as granisetron recipients (p < 0.01). There was no increase in the risk of CINV with ondansetron 32 mg compared with granisetron. Patients treated with ondansetron 8 mg required more rescue antiemetics and more prophylactic antiemetics in subsequent chemotherapy cycles than patients in the other groups. CONCLUSION: In a retrospective multicenter study, granisetron 1 mg or 10 microg/kg and ondansetron 32 mg appeared more effective than ondansetron 8 mg in preventing acute CINV related to cyclophosphamide therapy.