Literature DB >> 15127026

Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis.

Demetrios J Halazonetis1.   

Abstract

This article demonstrates morphometric methods by applying them to an orthodontic sample. A total of 150 pretreatment cephalograms of consecutive patients (84 female, 66 male) were traced and digitized. Fifteen points were used for the analysis. The tracings were superimposed by the Procrustes method, and shape variability was assessed by principal component analysis. Approximately 70% of the total sample variability was incorporated in the first 5 principal components. The most significant principal component, accounting for 29% of shape variability, was the divergence of skeletal pattern; the second principal component, accounting for 20% of shape variability, was the anteroposterior maxillary relationship. It is recommended that Procrustes superimposition and principal component analysis be incorporated into routine cephalometric analysis for more valid and comprehensive shape assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15127026     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  20 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of facial landmark data to characterize the facial phenotype associated with fetal alcohol syndrome.

Authors:  Tinashe Mutsvangwa; Tania S Douglas
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Sizing the shape: understanding morphometrics.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

3.  Dental arch size and shape after maxillary expansion in bilateral complete cleft palate: A comparison of three expander designs.

Authors:  Fernando Pugliese; Juan Martin Palomo; Louise Resti Calil; Arthur de Medeiros Alves; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A longitudinal three-center study of craniofacial morphology at 6 and 12 years of age in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Theodosia Bartzela; Christos Katsaros; Elisabeth Rønning; Sara Rizell; Gunvor Semb; Ewald Bronkhorst; Demetrios Halazonetis; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Shape covariation between the craniofacial complex and first molars in humans.

Authors:  Georgios Polychronis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Predicting adult facial type from mandibular landmark data at young ages.

Authors:  Heesoo Oh; Ryan Knigge; Anna Hardin; Richard Sherwood; Dana Duren; Manish Valiathan; Emily Leary; Kieran McNulty
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gkantidis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Maxillary lateral incisor agenesis is associated with maxillary form: a geometric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Michael Nemec; Linda Schwarz; Michael H Bertl; Kristina Bertl; André Gahleitner; Philipp Mitteroecker; Erwin Jonke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.606

9.  Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial variation, ontogeny and modularity in a cross-sectional sample of modern humans.

Authors:  H L L Wellens; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; D J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Morphological variability in unrepaired bilateral clefts with and without cleft palate evaluated with geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Abdul Latif; Mette A R Kuijpers; Martin Rachwalski; Benny S Latief; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.