Literature DB >> 15126795

Prostate cancer detection in the prostate specific antigen range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml: value of percent free prostate specific antigen on tumor detection and tumor aggressiveness.

Rene Raaijmakers1, Bert G Blijenberg, Judith A Finlay, Harry G Rittenhouse, Mark F Wildhagen, Monique J Roobol, Fritz H Schröder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the positive predictive value and cancer detection rate in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml and assessed the value of percent free (F) PSA (FPSA) on tumor detection and tumor aggressiveness in this low PSA range.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 3623 men who were attending the second round of screening within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam 883 had PSA values of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml. These men were offered laterally directed sextant biopsy. FPSA was prospectively determined from pretreatment serum. Cancers were classified as prognostically favorable and unfavorable using biopsy results and other pretreatment diagnostic features.
RESULTS: Using the PSA range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml as a biopsy indication 126 cancers were detected, resulting in a positive predictive value of 17.1% and a cancer detection rate of 14.3%. By using percent FPSA and setting relative sensitivity at 95% 9% of biopsies could have been avoided. Unfavorable tumor characteristics were found in 46.9% of the men with T1C tumors. Mean percent FPSA was significantly lower in such men compared to men with favorable tumor characteristics. Of the men with percent FPSA lower than 10% 90% had unfavorable tumor characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The PSA range 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml is accessible for prostate cancer screening. Percent FPSA is of moderate value in avoiding unnecessary biopsies in the PSA range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml. However, when assessing tumor aggressiveness in biopsy results, percent FPSA is predictive and can be used to select treatment options, such as watchful waiting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126795     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000127731.56103.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  A 49-year-old Hispanic male with intraepithelial neoplasia and focal atypia.

Authors:  Mark Soloway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Determining optimal prostate-specific antigen thresholds to identify an increased 4-year risk of prostate cancer development: an analysis within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  S Scott Sutton; E David Crawford; Judd W Moul; James W Hardin; Eric Kruep
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Methods for Assessing Improvement in Specificity when a Biomarker is Combined with a Standard Screening Test.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Margaret S Pepe; Todd A Alonzo; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

4.  Characteristics and outcome of prostate cancer with PSA <4 ng/ml at diagnosis: a population-based study.

Authors:  M Bonet; A Merglen; G Fioretta; E Rapiti; I Neyroud-Caspar; R Zanetti; R Miralbell; C Bouchardy
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Measurement of serum prostate cancer markers using a nanopore thin film based optofluidic chip.

Authors:  Salah Alzghoul; Mohammad Hailat; Sandra Zivanovic; Long Que; Girish V Shah
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  Multi-marker testing for cancer: what can we learn from modern prenatal testing for Trisomy-21.

Authors:  Erasmus Schneider; Gerald Mizejewski
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.