Literature DB >> 15126737

Hypopharyngeal perforation near-miss during transesophageal echocardiography.

Jonathan E Aviv1, Marco R Di Tullio, Shunichi Homma, Ian S Storper, Anne Zschommler, Guoguang Ma, Eva Petkova, Mark Murphy, Rosemary Desloge, Gary Shaw, Stanley Benjamin, Steven Corwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The traditional blind passage of a transesophageal echocardiography probe transorally through the hypopharynx is considered safe. Yet, severe hypopharyngeal complications during transesophageal echocardiography at several institutions led the authors to investigate whether traditional probe passage results in a greater incidence of hypopharyngeal injuries when compared with probe passage under direct visualization. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized, prospective clinical study.
METHODS: In 159 consciously sedated adults referred for transesophageal echocardiography, the authors performed transesophageal echocardiography with concomitant transnasal videoendoscopic monitoring of the hypopharynx. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive traditional (blind) or experimental (optical) transesophageal echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was frequency of hypopharyngeal injuries (hypopharyngeal lacerations or hematomas), and the secondary outcome measure was number of hypopharyngeal contacts.
RESULTS: No perforation occurred with either technique. However, hypopharyngeal lacerations or hematomas occurred in 19 of 80 (23.8%) patients with the traditional technique (11 superficial lacerations of pyriform sinus, 1 laceration of pharynx, 12 arytenoid hematomas, 2 vocal fold hematomas, and 1 pyriform hematoma) and in 1 of 79 patients (1.3%) with the optical technique (superficial pyriform laceration) (P =.001). All traumatized patients underwent flexible laryngoscopy, but none required additional intervention. Respectively, hypopharyngeal contacts were more frequent with the traditional than with the optical technique at the pyriform sinus (70.0% vs. 10.1% [P =.001]), arytenoid (55.0% vs. 3.8% [P =.001]), and vocal fold (15.0% vs. 3.86% [P =.016]).
CONCLUSION: Optically guided trans-esophageal echocardiography results in significantly fewer hypopharyngeal injuries and fewer contacts than traditional, blind transesophageal echocardiography. The optically guided technique may result in decreased frequency of potentially significant complications and therefore in improved patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126737     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200405000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Perforation of the hypopharynx after transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Takayuki Onishi; Yuko Onishi; Keiko Tachibana; Kensuke Kasano; Shoko Hachiya; Hirotaka Muramoto; Koji Higuchi; Atsushi Suzuki; Isshi Kobayashi; Shigeo Umezawa; Akihiro Niwa
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-04-22

2.  Surgical management of a life-threatening retro-pharyngeal haematoma following trans-oesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  F Ottaviani; A Schindler; F Mozzanica; A Peri; S Rezzonico; M Turiel
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Optimal head position during transesophageal echocardiographic probe insertion for pediatric patients weighing up to 10 kg.

Authors:  Christopher R Mart; Kerry L Rosen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  A Rare Case of Iatrogenic Deep Neck Infection Secondary to Hypopharyngeal Injury Caused by the Transesophageal Echocardiography.

Authors:  Hyung Yoon Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Sung-Ji Park; Jin-Oh Choi; Sung-A Chang; Sung Mok Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Jae K Oh; Seung Woo Park
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-24

5.  McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope for insertion of a transoesophageal echocardiography probe: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Takashi Ishida; Chiaki Kiuchi; Takemi Sekiguchi; Takatoshi Tsujimoto; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Hemodynamic monitoring using trans esophageal echocardiography in patients with shock.

Authors:  Florence Boissier; François Bagate; Armand Mekontso Dessap
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.