Literature DB >> 15126151

Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss.

Felipe A Medeiros1, Pamela A Sample, Robert N Weinreb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry results predict glaucomatous visual field defects, as assessed by standard automated perimetry (SAP), in a glaucoma suspect population.
DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study.
METHODS: The study included 105 eyes of 105 glaucoma suspect patients, with a mean follow-up time of 41 +/- 17 months. Glaucoma suspects had either intraocular pressure (IOP) higher than or equal to 23 mm Hg or glaucomatous optic neuropathy by stereophotograph assessment. All patients had normal SAP visual fields at baseline. A baseline FDT test was performed within 3 months of the normal SAP examination. Several baseline FDT parameters and other variables (age, gender, IOP, central corneal thickness, SAP visual field indices, and stereophotograph assessment) were investigated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to obtain hazard ratios (HR) and identify factors that predicted which patients had SAP glaucomatous visual field loss during follow-up.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (16%) developed repeatable SAP visual field abnormality during follow-up. An abnormal FDT examination at baseline predicted the development of SAP visual field conversion in both univariate (HR = 3.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-8.25; P =.018) and multivariate models (Adjusted HR = 3.68; 95% CI = 1.06-12.8; P =.04). The analysis of FDT examinations during follow-up revealed that in 59% of converters the FDT abnormalities preceded SAP visual field loss by as much as 4 years. Also, the initial development of glaucomatous visual field loss as measured by SAP occurred in regions that had previously demonstrated abnormalities on FDT testing.
CONCLUSION: Functional abnormalities detected by FDT perimetry were predictive of the future onset and location of SAP visual field loss among glaucoma suspect patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126151     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  47 in total

1.  Preventing blindness: seeing is believing.

Authors:  Ken Flegel; Noni E MacDonald; Matthew B Stanbrook; Astika Kappagoda; Paul C Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Frequency-doubling technology and retinal measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Takafumi Hirashima; Masanori Hangai; Masayuki Nukada; Noriko Nakano; Satoshi Morooka; Tadamichi Akagi; Atsushi Nonaka; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Interpretation of the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 test in the diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma.

Authors:  Jin A Choi; Na Young Lee; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Investigate Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Predicting Development of Glaucoma.

Authors:  Carolina N Susanna; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Fábio B Daga; Bianca N Susanna; Feilin Zhu; Nara G Ogata; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  Effect of cataract extraction on frequency doubling technology perimetry in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  M A R Siddiqui; A Azuara-Blanco; S Neville
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Comparison of different methods of inter-eye asymmetry of rim area and disc area analysis.

Authors:  A A K Fansi; H Boisjoly; M Chagnon; P J Harasymowycz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry.

Authors:  Zvia Burgansky-Eliash; Gadi Wollstein; Avni Patel; Richard A Bilonick; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Larry Kagemann; William D Dilworth; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change.

Authors:  Daniel Meira-Freitas; Andrew J Tatham; Renato Lisboa; Tung-Mei Kuang; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Combining Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry and Scanning Laser Polarimetry for Glaucoma Detection.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren; Jessica T Hochberg; Donald L Budenz; Robert T Chang; Pradeep Y Ramulu
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2015 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.