Literature DB >> 15126069

Divergent immunological responses following glutaraldehyde exposure.

Shahla Azadi1, Kimberly J Klink, B Jean Meade.   

Abstract

Although Glutaraldehyde (Glut) has been demonstrated to be a moderate contact sensitizer, numerous cases of occupational asthma related to Glut exposure have been reported. The purpose of these studies was to examine the dose-response relationship between Glut exposure and the development of T cell-mediated vs. IgE- mediated responses. Initial evaluation of the sensitization potential was conducted using the local lymph node assay (LLNA) at concentrations ranging from 0.75% to 2.5%. A concentration-dependent increase in lymphocyte proliferation was observed with EC3 values of 0.072% and 0.089% in CBA and BALB/c mice, respectively. The mouse ear swelling test (MEST) was used to evaluate the potential for Glut to elicit IgE (1/2 h post challenge) and contact hypersensitivity (24 and 48 h post challenge) responses. An immediate response was observed in animals induced and challenged with 2.5% Glut, whereas animals induced with 0.1% or 0.75% and challenged with 2.5% exhibited a delayed response 48 h post challenge. IgE-inducing potential was evaluated by phenotypic analysis of draining lymph node cells and measurement of total serum IgE levels. Only the 2.5% exposed group demonstrated a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the percentage of IgE(+)B220(+) cells and serum IgE. Following 3 days of dermal exposure, a significant increase in IL-4 mRNA in the draining lymph nodes was observed only in the 2.5% exposed group. These results indicate that the development of an immediate vs. a delayed hypersensitivity response following dermal exposure to Glut is at least in part mediated by the exposure concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15126069     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  8 in total

1.  Irritancy and allergic responses induced by exposure to the indoor air chemical 4-oxopentanal.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; Laurel G Jackson; J R Wells; Jason E Ham; B J Meade
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Irritancy and allergic responses induced by topical application of ortho-phthalaldehyde.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Christina Umbright; Rajendran Sellamuthu; Kara Fluharty; Michael Kashon; Jennifer Franko; Laurel G Jackson; Victor J Johnson; Pius Joseph
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Evaluation of dicarbonyls generated in a simulated indoor air environment using an in vitro exposure system.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Laurel G Jackson; Jennifer Franko; J R Wells
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Glutaraldehyde exposure and its occupational impact in the health care environment.

Authors:  Derek R Smith; Rui-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  Reactions of ozone with human skin lipids: sources of carbonyls, dicarbonyls, and hydroxycarbonyls in indoor air.

Authors:  Armin Wisthaler; Charles J Weschler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inhalation of ortho-phthalaldehyde vapor causes respiratory sensitization in mice.

Authors:  Victor J Johnson; Jeffrey S Reynolds; Wei Wang; Kara Fluharty; Berran Yucesoy
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-07-14

7.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

8.  Persistent and Unusual Respiratory Findings after Prolonged Glutaraldehyde Exposure.

Authors:  S Copeland; K Nugent
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.