BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard treatment policy for all potentially curable patients with gastric cancer is radical resection including extensive lymphadenectomy. This treatment strategy has been used for both early and advanced gastric cancers, and substantial increases in survival time have been reported. In advanced gastric cancer, lymphatic spread is reported to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer resected for cure. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting lymph node involvement and to establish guidelines for the extent of lymph node dissection most appropriate for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of 926 patients with gastric cancer were reviewed. Information on the clinicopathological features was obtained from the database of gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai National Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses of data for patients with gastric cancer tumors were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features. The independent risk factors influencing lymph node metastasis were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The following clinicopathologic factors were found to be correlated with prognosis of gastric cancer: (1) macroscopic type, (2) depth of invasion, (3) cancer-stromal relationship, (4) histological growth pattern, (5) lymph node involvement, (6) lymphatic invasion, (7) vascular invasion and (8) tumor site. However, a multivariate analysis revealed that macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement and tumor site are independent risk factors for the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Among these factors, the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer was most strongly influenced by lymph node involvement (odds ratio, 4.632). According to a multiple logistic regression model, depth of cancer invasion and lymphatic invasion was significantly correlated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node involvement has the strongest influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer. Among the clinicopathological factors, depth of invasion and microscopically lymphatic invasion are important factors in predicting lymph node metastases. Thus, the ability to perform gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes is a basic requirement for gastric cancer surgeons.
BACKGROUND: In Japan, the standard treatment policy for all potentially curable patients with gastric cancer is radical resection including extensive lymphadenectomy. This treatment strategy has been used for both early and advanced gastric cancers, and substantial increases in survival time have been reported. In advanced gastric cancer, lymphatic spread is reported to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer resected for cure. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting lymph node involvement and to establish guidelines for the extent of lymph node dissection most appropriate for the treatment of gastric cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of 926 patients with gastric cancer were reviewed. Information on the clinicopathological features was obtained from the database of gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai National Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses of data for patients with gastric cancer tumors were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features. The independent risk factors influencing lymph node metastasis were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The following clinicopathologic factors were found to be correlated with prognosis of gastric cancer: (1) macroscopic type, (2) depth of invasion, (3) cancer-stromal relationship, (4) histological growth pattern, (5) lymph node involvement, (6) lymphatic invasion, (7) vascular invasion and (8) tumor site. However, a multivariate analysis revealed that macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement and tumor site are independent risk factors for the prognosis of gastric cancerpatients. Among these factors, the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer was most strongly influenced by lymph node involvement (odds ratio, 4.632). According to a multiple logistic regression model, depth of cancer invasion and lymphatic invasion was significantly correlated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node involvement has the strongest influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer. Among the clinicopathological factors, depth of invasion and microscopically lymphatic invasion are important factors in predicting lymph node metastases. Thus, the ability to perform gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes is a basic requirement for gastric cancer surgeons.