Literature DB >> 15123970

The efficacy of facilitated tucking for relieving procedural pain of endotracheal suctioning in very low birthweight infants.

Charlotte Ward-Larson1, Robert A Horn, Florence Gosnell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy of a behavioral pain reducing intervention (facilitated tucking) with standard neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) care for decreasing procedural pain (endotracheal suctioning) in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective randomized crossover design with infants as their own controls were used. The sample consisted of 40 VLBW infants, 23-32 weeks gestation, and weighing 560-1498 g with tracheal intubation. The infants were observed twice during each endotracheal suctioning experience; one suctioning was done according to normal nursery routine; another was done using facilitated tucking (the caregiver "hand-swaddling" the infant by placing a hand on the infant's head and feet while providing flexion and containment). The Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) measured the infant's pain response, and severity of illness of each infant was measured by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP) and the NTISS (Neonatal Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System). Repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA) determined the efficacy of facilitated tucking for reducing procedural pain (PIPP) and the effects of order of intervention vs. control. Regression analyses examined the relationship of gestational age, severity of illness, and number of painful procedures to the pain response.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the PIPP scores for tucking and nontucking positions (p = 0.001) and a nonsignificant interaction with order (p = 0.64) as well as a nonsignificant main effect for order (p = 0.46). In the regression analyses, all predictors taken together did not significantly predict PIPP scores in the tucked position (p = 0.11) or nontucked position (p = 0.57). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Facilitated tucking is a developmentally sensitive, nonpharmacological comfort measure that can relieve procedural pain in VLBW infants. Nurses need to be increasingly aware of infant pain during daily care taking, and to use validated pain assessment instruments. Further clinical research on individual pain assessment is needed for better understanding of the quality and significance of pain for each infant, and the factors that affect pain expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123970     DOI: 10.1097/00005721-200405000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs        ISSN: 0361-929X            Impact factor:   1.412


  16 in total

Review 1.  Nonpharmacological management of procedural pain in infants and young children: an abridged Cochrane review.

Authors:  Rebecca Pillai Riddell; Nicole Racine; Kara Turcotte; Lindsay Uman; Rachel Horton; Laila Din Osmun; Sara Ahola Kohut; Jessica Hillgrove-Stuart; Bonnie Stevens; Diana Lisi
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Stress response and procedural pain in the preterm newborn: the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Authors:  Eloisa Gitto; Salvatore Pellegrino; Maria Manfrida; Salvatore Aversa; Giuseppe Trimarchi; Ignazio Barberi; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Oral glucose in preterm neonates during oropharyngeal suctioning: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Katharina Vezyroglou; Katrin Mehler; Angela Kribs; Ingrid Becker; Kristina Langhammer; Bernhard Roth; Christoph Hünseler
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  [Non-pharmaceutical measures, topical analgesics and oral administration of glucose in pain management: Austrian interdisciplinary recommendations on pediatric perioperative pain management].

Authors:  B Messerer; B Krauss-Stoisser; B Urlesberger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants using four-handed versus routine care.

Authors:  Sharon Cone; Rita H Pickler; Mary Jo Grap; Jacqueline McGrath; Paul M Wiley
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

6.  Kangaroo Care modifies preterm infant heart rate variability in response to heel stick pain: pilot study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Cong; Susan M Ludington-Hoe; Gail McCain; Pingfu Fu
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The effect of facilitated tucking position during painful procedure in pain management of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mansueto Gomes Neto; Isabella Aira da Silva Lopes; Ana Carolina Cunha Lacerda Morais Araujo; Lucas Silva Oliveira; Micheli Bernardone Saquetto
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Preterm infants' behaviors and skin conductance responses to nurse handling in the NICU.

Authors:  Veronika Zeiner; Hanne Storm; Kim Kopenhaver Doheny
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-10-06

9.  Touch and massage for medically fragile infants.

Authors:  Karen Livingston; Shay Beider; Alexis J Kant; Constance C Gallardo; Michael H Joseph; Jeffrey I Gold
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.

Authors:  Rebecca R Pillai Riddell; Nicole M Racine; Hannah G Gennis; Kara Turcotte; Lindsay S Uman; Rachel E Horton; Sara Ahola Kohut; Jessica Hillgrove Stuart; Bonnie Stevens; Diana M Lisi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.