Literature DB >> 1512393

Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making.

D M High1.   

Abstract

Because patients with Alzheimer's disease are on a path of declining capacity to give consent, advancement of research with Alzheimer's disease subjects presents challenging and perplexing ethical and legal dilemmas. Although generic regulations for the protection of human subjects apply, special considerations for cognitively impaired dementia subjects have depended on local Institutional Review Boards and relevant state laws and regulations, producing a lack of uniformity regarding encouragement of research and protection of subjects. Discussed are the dilemmas encountered in advancing research with Alzheimer's disease subjects, including (1) issues about informed consent, (2) determination of decision-making capacity (competency), (3) problems in dealing with subjects of mild and fluctuating impairment, and (4) proxy and advance consent measures for severely impaired subjects. Proposed is an agenda of ethical research needs for advancing biomedical research on Alzheimer's disease. Needed are empirical studies concerning recruitment of Alzheimer's disease subjects, the actual processes of informed consent, and the difficulties encountered by researchers, collaborative development of tests for both diagnosing Alzheimer's disease and assessing subjects' capacities to provide informed consent, and exploration of innovative uses of advance and proxy consents for participation in Alzheimer's disease research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Physicians; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; NIH Clinical Center; National Institute on Aging; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1512393     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01995.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Experienced consent in geriatrics research: a new method to optimize the capacity to consent in frail elderly subjects.

Authors:  M G Rikkert; J H van den Bercken; H A ten Have; W H Hoefnagels
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Informed consent in biomedical studies on aging: survey of four journals.

Authors:  M G Olde Rikkert; H A ten Have; W H Hoefnagels
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-02

Review 4.  Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in patients with dementia. The problem of patient decision-making capacity.

Authors:  A R Derse
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1999-01

5.  Do research procedures pose relatively greater risk for healthy persons than for persons with schizophrenia?

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Katherine A Green Hammond; Teddy D Warner
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  The World War II plutonium experiments: contested stories and their lessons for medical research and informed consent.

Authors:  S R Kaufman
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  1997-06

Review 7.  Understanding cognition in older patients with cancer.

Authors:  Meghan Karuturi; Melisa L Wong; Tina Hsu; Gretchen G Kimmick; Stuart M Lichtman; Holly M Holmes; Sharon K Inouye; William Dale; Kah P Loh; Mary I Whitehead; Allison Magnuson; Arti Hurria; Michelle C Janelsins; Supriya Mohile
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 8.  The U-ARE Protocol: A Pragmatic Approach to Decisional Capacity Assessment for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Rachel K B Hamilton; Cynthia H Phelan; Nathaniel A Chin; Mary F Wyman; Nickolas Lambrou; Nichelle Cobb; Amy J H Kind; Hanna Blazel; Sanjay Asthana; Carey E Gleason
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

Review 9.  Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.

Authors:  Susanne Rebers; Neil K Aaronson; Flora E van Leeuwen; Marjanka K Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.