Literature DB >> 15123788

Effect of sodium arsenite on peripheral lymphocytes in vitro: individual susceptibility among a population exposed to arsenic through the drinking water.

Julie Mahata1, Pritha Ghosh, Jyotirindra N Sarkar, Kunal Ray, Adayapalam T Natarajan, Ashok K Giri.   

Abstract

Arsenic (As) contamination in ground water has affected more than 19 countries. Approximately 36 million people in the Bengal delta alone are exposed to this toxicant via drinking water (>50 microg/l) and are at potential health risk. Chronic ingestion of As via drinking water is associated with occurrence of skin lesions, cancer and other arsenic-induced diseases in West Bengal, India. An in vitro cytogenetic study was performed utilizing chromosomal aberrations (CA) in lymphocytes treated with sodium arsenite (0-5 microM) in six symptomatic (having arsenic-related skin lesions) individuals, six age- and sex-matched As-exposed asymptomatic (no arsenic-related skin lesions) individuals and six control individuals with similar socio-economic status residing in non-affected districts of West Bengal with no evidence of As exposure. The mean As content in nails and hair was 9.61 and 5.23 microg/g in symptomatic, 3.48 and 2.17 microg/g in asymptomatic and 0.42 and 0.33 microg/g in the control individuals, respectively. The main aim of our study was to determine whether genotoxic effects differed in the lymphocytes of the control (no exposure to arsenic), asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals after in vitro treatment with sodium arsenite. Although both the exposed groups had chronic exposure to As through the drinking water, individuals with skin lesions accumulated more As in their nails and hair and excreted less in urine (127.80 versus 164.15 microg/l). The results show that sodium arsenite induced a significantly higher percentage of aberrant cells in the lymphocytes of control individuals than in the lymphocytes of both the exposed groups. Within the two exposed groups As induced higher incidences of CA in the symptomatic than the asymptomatic individuals. These results suggest that asymptomatic individuals have relatively lower sensitivity and susceptibility to induction of genetic damage by As compared with the symptomatic individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123788     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geh022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  12 in total

1.  Mutually exclusive subsets of BH3-only proteins are activated by the p53 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/c-Jun signaling pathways during cortical neuron apoptosis induced by arsenite.

Authors:  Hon Kit Wong; Michael Fricker; Andreas Wyttenbach; Andreas Villunger; Ewa M Michalak; Andreas Strasser; Aviva M Tolkovsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Changing the Risk Paradigms Can be Good for Our Health: J-Shaped, Linear and Threshold Dose-Response Models.

Authors:  P F Ricci; S R Straja; A L Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  p53-Based Strategy for Protection of Bone Marrow From Y-90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan.

Authors:  Hang Su; Suthakar Ganapathy; Xiaolei Li; Zhi-Min Yuan; Chul S Ha
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Chronic arsenic exposure suppresses ATM pathway activation in human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Alexandra N Nail; Lakynkalina M McCaffrey; Mayukh Banerjee; Ana P Ferragut Cardoso; J Christopher States
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Nrf2 protects against As(III)-induced damage in mouse liver and bladder.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Zheping Huang; Jefferson Y Chan; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Activation of Nrf2 by arsenite and monomethylarsonous acid is independent of Keap1-C151: enhanced Keap1-Cul3 interaction.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Wang; Zheng Sun; Weimin Chen; Yanjie Li; Nicole F Villeneuve; Donna D Zhang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Comparison of Barium and Arsenic Concentrations in Well Drinking Water and in Human Body Samples and a Novel Remediation System for These Elements in Well Drinking Water.

Authors:  Masashi Kato; Mayuko Y Kumasaka; Shoko Ohnuma; Akio Furuta; Yoko Kato; Hossain U Shekhar; Michiyo Kojima; Yasuko Koike; Nguyen Dinh Thang; Nobutaka Ohgami; Thuy Bich Ly; Xiaofang Jia; Husna Yetti; Hisao Naito; Gaku Ichihara; Ichiro Yajima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Well water arsenic exposure, arsenic induced skin-lesions and self-reported morbidity in Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  Yajuan Xia; Timothy J Wade; Kegong Wu; Yanhong Li; Zhixiong Ning; X Chris Le; Xingzhou He; Binfei Chen; Yong Feng; Judy L Mumford
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population.

Authors:  Pritha Ghosh; Arindam Basu; Keshav K Singh; Ashok K Giri
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Low-dose arsenic induces chemotherapy protection via p53/NF-κB-mediated metabolic regulation.

Authors:  S Ganapathy; S Xiao; S-J Seo; R Lall; M Yang; T Xu; H Su; M Shadfan; C S Ha; Z-M Yuan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.