Literature DB >> 15123534

Neurological events during long-term mechanical circulatory support for heart failure: the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) experience.

Ronald M Lazar1, Peter A Shapiro, Brian E Jaski, Michael K Parides, Robert C Bourge, John T Watson, Laura Damme, Walter Dembitsky, Jeffrey D Hosenpud, Lopa Gupta, Anita Tierney, Tonya Kraus, Yoshifumi Naka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progression of heart failure can lead to cardiac transplantation, but when patients are ineligible, long-term mechanical circulatory support may improve survival. The REMATCH trial showed that left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) prolonged survival in patients with end-stage disease, but with a significant number of adverse events. We report on the neurological outcomes in the REMATCH trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We examined new neurological events in the 129 patients randomized to either LVAD placement (n=68) or medical management (n=61), classified as stroke, transient ischemic attack, toxic-metabolic encephalopathy, and other. There were 46 neurological events: 42 in 30 LVAD patients and 4 in 4 patients in the medical arm (chi2, 30/68 versus 4/61, P<0.001). Sixteen percent of the LVAD patients had a stroke, with a rate of 0.19 per year (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.33), many occurring in the postoperative period. The stroke rate in the medical arm was 0.052. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 44% reduction in the risk of stroke or death in the LVAD group versus the optimal medical group (P=0.002). The mean interval from implantation to stroke was 221.8 days (+/-70.4 days). History of stroke, age, and sepsis were not stroke risk factors in the LVAD group.
CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than half of the patients in the LVAD group had a neurological event, and there were few neurological deaths. Survival analysis combining stroke or death demonstrated a significant benefit for long-term circulatory support with an LVAD over medical therapy. Future trials will need to address prospectively all neurological outcomes, including neurocognitive function, and the role of long-term neuroprotection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123534     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000129414.95137.CD

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  26 in total

1.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy for End-stage Heart Failure.

Authors:  Lynne Warner Stevenson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Jasper J Brugts
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-24

3.  Outcomes after stroke complicating left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Joshua Z Willey; Michael V Gavalas; Pauline N Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; A Reshad Garan; Allison P Levin; Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Justin Fried; Yoshifumi Naka; Veli K Topkara; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Thrombotic events in critically ill children with myocarditis.

Authors:  Kimberly Y Lin; Basavaraj Kerur; Char M Witmer; Lauren A Beslow; Daniel J Licht; Rebecca N Ichord; Beth D Kaufman
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 1.093

5.  A case of postoperative cognitive decline, with a highly elevated C- reactive protein, status post left ventricular assist device insertion: a review of the neuroinflammatory hypothesis of delirium.

Authors:  David R Spiegel; Victoria Chen
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-01

6.  Managing drugs and devices in patients with permanent ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Martin Cadeiras; Manuel von Bayern; Mario C Deng
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

7.  Prospective, observational study of antiplatelet and coagulation biomarkers as predictors of thromboembolic events after implantation of ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Farhan Majeed; Willem J Kop; Robert S Poston; Seeta Kallam; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

8.  Highlights from the fifth international symposium of thrombosis and anticoagulation (ISTA V), October 18-19, 2012, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Richard C Becker; L Kristin Newby; Eric D Peterson; Elaine M Hylek; Robert Giugliano; Christopher B Granger; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Antonio C Carvalho; Otavio Berwanger; Roberto R Giraldez; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Marcia M Barbosa; Maria da Consolacao V Moreira; Renato A K Kalil; Marildes Freitas; Joao Carlos de Campos Guerra; Marcio Vinicius Lins Barros; Thiago da Rocha Rodrigues; Antonio C Lopes; David A Garcia
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Device thrombogenicity emulation: a novel methodology for optimizing the thromboresistance of cardiovascular devices.

Authors:  Danny Bluestein; Gaurav Girdhar; Shmuel Einav; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Conventional radiography and computed tomography of cardiac assist devices.

Authors:  Hans Scheffel; Paul Stolzmann; Markus J Wilhelm; Mario Lachat; Lotus Desbiolles; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas Frauenfelder; Thomas Schertler; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.