Stephen R Kisely1, Jianguo Xiao, Neil J Preston. 1. University Department of Psychiatry at Fremantle Hospital, University of Western Australia, Australia. Stephen.Kisely@cdha.nshealth.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether compulsory community treatment for psychiatric patients reduces hospital admission rates. AIMS: To examine whether community treatment orders (CTOs) reduce admission rates, using a two-stage design of matching and multivariate analyses to take into account socio-demographic factors, clinical factors, case complexity and previous psychiatric and forensic history. METHOD: Survival analysis of CTO cases and controls from three linked Western Australian databases of health service use, involuntary treatment and forensic history. We used two control groups: one matched on demographic characteristics, diagnosis, past psychiatric history and treatment setting, and consecutive controls matched on date of discharge from in-patient care. RESULTS: We matched 265 CTO cases with 265 matched controls and 224 consecutive controls (total n=754). The CTO group had a significantly higher readmission rate: 72% v. 65% and 59% for the matched and consecutive controls (log-rank chi(2)=4.7, P=0.03). CTO placement, aboriginal ethnicity, younger age, personality disorder and previous health service use were associated with increased admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Community treatment orders alone do not reduce admissions.
BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether compulsory community treatment for psychiatricpatients reduces hospital admission rates. AIMS: To examine whether community treatment orders (CTOs) reduce admission rates, using a two-stage design of matching and multivariate analyses to take into account socio-demographic factors, clinical factors, case complexity and previous psychiatric and forensic history. METHOD: Survival analysis of CTO cases and controls from three linked Western Australian databases of health service use, involuntary treatment and forensic history. We used two control groups: one matched on demographic characteristics, diagnosis, past psychiatric history and treatment setting, and consecutive controls matched on date of discharge from in-patient care. RESULTS: We matched 265 CTO cases with 265 matched controls and 224 consecutive controls (total n=754). The CTO group had a significantly higher readmission rate: 72% v. 65% and 59% for the matched and consecutive controls (log-rank chi(2)=4.7, P=0.03). CTO placement, aboriginal ethnicity, younger age, personality disorder and previous health service use were associated with increased admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Community treatment orders alone do not reduce admissions.