Literature DB >> 15123093

Endoscopic stenting of colonic tumours.

Todd H Baron1, Richard A Kozarek.   

Abstract

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are useful for the non-surgical relief of malignant colonic obstruction. They may be used both as a palliative measure and as a pre-operative bridge to facilitate a one-stage surgical resection of primary colonic tumours. SEMS may be placed endoscopically or by interventional radiologists without the use of endoscopy. In experienced centres SEMS can be successfully placed in approximately 90% of cases. Although it is known that the placement of these devices is feasible, there are no prospective trials comparing stent placement for colonic obstruction to routine surgical care. Additionally, there are no studies comparing the outcome of the method of placement (endoscopic versus radiological). This chapter reviews the types of expandable metal stent used for treatment of colonic obstruction, the indications for their insertion, their methods of insertion, and outcomes following insertion. Future research directions using expandable stents for colonic tumours are also addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15123093     DOI: 10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00098-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  13 in total

1.  Duodenal and colonic stent placement with 0.025″ and 0.035″ guidewires is equally safe and effective.

Authors:  Jessica Chan; Kristen Hilden; John Fang; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The cost-effectiveness of colonic stenting as a bridge to curative surgery in patients with acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a Canadian perspective.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Steven Latosinsky; Brennan M R Spiegel; Laura E Targownik
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Long-term success of colonic stent insertion is influenced by indication but not by length of stent or site of obstruction.

Authors:  Christian P Selinger; Jayapal Ramesh; Derrick F Martin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Treatment of non-pain-related symptoms.

Authors:  Charles F von Gunten; Ellin Gafford
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  Effect of metal surface characteristics on the adhesion performance of the integrated low-level energies method of adhesion.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Aodai; Toru Masuzawa; Kazuhide Ozeki; Akio Kishida; Tetsuya Higami
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Community experience of colonic stenting in patients with acute large bowel obstructions.

Authors:  Naveen Arya; Douglas Bair; Praag Arya; Joe Pham
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Comparison of colonic stenting and open surgery for malignant large bowel obstruction.

Authors:  H S Tilney; R E Lovegrove; S Purkayastha; P S Sains; G K Weston-Petrides; A W Darzi; P P Tekkis; A G Heriot
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A novel anchoring system for colonic stents: a pilot in vivo study in a porcine model.

Authors:  A Nevler; U Willantz; O Doron; J Sandbank; Y Ziv
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Transanal endoscopic tube decompression of acute colonic obstruction: experience with 51 cases.

Authors:  A Fischer; H J Schrag; M Goos; R Obermaier; U T Hopt; P K Baier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Enteral stents for the management of malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Jeremy Kaplan; Anna Strongin; Douglas G Adler; Ali A Siddiqui
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.