Literature DB >> 15122682

Selection of the optimum b factor for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessment of ischemic stroke.

Peter B Kingsley1, W Gordon Monahan.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the diffusion sensitivity factor b that optimizes the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for both diffusion-weighted signal intensity and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCNR) when evaluating ischemic stroke by diffusion-weighted MRI. The relative contrast, noise levels, CNR, and ADCNR were calculated for typical ADC values in human brain, 780 microm(2)/s in adults and 1200 microm(2)/s in neonates in normal tissue, 20-40% less in acute and subacute stroke, and 50% more in chronic stroke. The optimum b factor depends strongly on the ADC, whether TE is fixed or varies with the b factor, whether CNR or ADCNR is measured, and anisotropy. The optimum b factor in adults is 1000 s/mm(2) in acute and chronic stroke, and 1200 s/mm(2) in subacute stroke. The optimum values are about 200 s/mm(2) lower in neonates than in adults. The CNR and ADCNR are within 10% of the optimum over at least a 2-fold range of b factors, from 68-136% of the optimum b factor. If a single b factor is to be used for all situations, a diffusion b factor of 1000 s/mm(2) is recommended. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122682     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  17 in total

1.  Decoupling of imaging and diffusion gradients in DTI.

Authors:  Alpay Ozcan
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

2.  Can we shorten the q-space imaging to make it clinically feasible?

Authors:  Koji Sakai; Kei Yamada; Kentaro Akazawa; Jun Tazoe; Masashi Yasuike; Hitomi Nagano; Hiroyasu Ikeno; Toshiaki Nakagawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Optimization of b-value sampling for diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Hersh Chandarana; Pippa Storey; Qun Chen; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Minimization of imaging gradient effects in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Alpay Özcan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Detection of middle ear cholesteatoma by diffusion-weighted MR imaging: multishot echo-planar imaging compared with single-shot echo-planar imaging.

Authors:  K Yamashita; T Yoshiura; A Hiwatashi; H Kamano; T Dashjamts; S Shibata; A Tamae; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Estimation of optimal b-value sets for obtaining apparent diffusion coefficient free from perfusion in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kishor Karki; Geoffrey D Hugo; John C Ford; Kathryn M Olsen; Siddharth Saraiya; Robert Groves; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Naranamangalam R Jagannathan; Virendra Kumar; Rajeev Kumar; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Q-space truncation and sampling in diffusion spectrum imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Tian; Ariel Rokem; Rebecca D Folkerth; Aapo Nummenmaa; Qiuyun Fan; Brian L Edlow; Jennifer A McNab
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A unified optimization approach for diffusion tensor imaging technique.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Hongtu Zhu; Weili Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Using diffusion MRI for measuring the temperature of cerebrospinal fluid within the lateral ventricles.

Authors:  L R Kozak; M Bango; M Szabo; G Rudas; Z Vidnyanszky; Z Nagy
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.299

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.