Literature DB >> 15121751

Magnetic Resonance for T-staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma--the most informative pair of sequences.

Kam Y Lau1, Wai K Kan, Wai M Sze, Anne W M Lee, John K W Chan, Tsz K Yau, Rebecca M Yeung, Lawrence Tan, Ping O Chan, Alex S L Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most informative pair of sequences in magnetic resonance (MR) for T-staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: The MR images of 134 patients with newly diagnosed NPC, from 1996 to 2002, were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were scanned using 1.5 Tesla MR systems. The images of the nasopharynx were reviewed by two qualified radiologists to determine the positive findings and the T-stage by UICC (6th edition) System, using each sequence separately. The T-stage derived from a single MR sequence was then compared with the T-stage based on the five selected sequences to assess the number and percentage of patients who were being understaged. Therefore, the overall percentage accuracy of each single sequence could be determined. A pair of sequences providing information to achieve almost 100% diagnostic accuracy was then derived.
RESULTS: The overall percentage accuracy of five individual sequences of the nasopharynx is as follows: contrast-enhanced (CE) fat suppression (FS) axial T1 (94.8%), CE FS coronal T1 (88.1%), FS axial T2 (85.8%), non-contrast enhanced (NE) axial T1 (78.4%) and non-contrast enhanced (NE) coronal T1 (77.6%). CE FS axial T1 has the best accuracy. All the structures that are missed in CE FS axial T1, which lead to apparent understaging, are appreciated in NE axial T1-weighted images.
CONCLUSION: Individual sequences supplement each other in the NPC staging. CE FS axial T1 is the most informative individual sequence. Combination of CE FS axial T1 and NE axial T1 of the nasopharynx provides sufficient information to achieve almost 100% diagnostic accuracy in T-staging; therefore, both should be included in the MR-staging protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121751     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyh033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  6 in total

1.  Convolutional neural network in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: how good is automatic delineation for primary tumor on a non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI?

Authors:  Lun M Wong; Qi Yong H Ai; Frankie K F Mo; Darren M C Poon; Ann D King
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  [Imaging diagnostics of the pharynx and larynx].

Authors:  S Ruffing; T Struffert; A Grgic; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Extension patterns of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  F Dubrulle; R Souillard; R Hermans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  MRI to delineate the gross tumor volume of nasopharyngeal cancers: which sequences and planes should be used?

Authors:  Aron Popovtzer; Mohannad Ibrahim; Daniel Tatro; Felix Y Feng; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Consistency of T2WI-FS/ASL fusion images in delineating the volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Meng Lin; Xiaoduo Yu; Han Ouyang; Dehong Luo; Chunwu Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Diagnostic challenges in a case of an isolated third nerve palsy.

Authors:  Priya Sivakumar; Savithri Palanive; Debasis Gochait; Olivia Hess
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2020-01-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.