Literature DB >> 15121701

Development of a simultaneous boost IMRT class solution for a hypofractionated prostate cancer protocol.

J H Mott1, J E Livsey, J P Logue.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a robust technique for planning intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer patients who are to be entered into a proposed hypofractionated dose escalation study. In this study the dose escalation will be restricted to the prostate alone, which may be regarded as a concurrent boost volume within the overall planning target volume (PTV). The dose to the prostate itself is to be delivered in 3 Gy fractions, and for this phase of the study the total prostate dose will be 57 Gy in 19 fractions, with 50 Gy prescribed to the rest of the PTV. If acute toxicity results are acceptable, the next phase will escalate doses to 60 Gy in 20 x 3 Gy fractions. There will be 30 patients in each arm. This work describes the class solution which was developed to create IMRT plans for this study, and which enabled the same set of inverse planning parameters to be used during optimization for every patient with minimal planner intervention. The resulting dose distributions were compared with those that would be achieved from a 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique that used a multileaf collimator (MLC) but no intensity modulation to treat the PTV, followed by a sequential boost to raise the prostate to 57 Gy. The two methods were tested on anatomical data sets for a series of 10 patients who would have been eligible for this study, and the techniques were compared in terms of doses to the target volumes and the organs at risk. The IMRT method resulted in much greater sparing of the rectum and bladder than the 3DCRT technique, whilst still delivering acceptable doses to the target volumes. In particular, the volume of rectum receiving the minimum PTV dose of 47.5 Gy was reduced from a mean value of 36.9% (range 23.4% to 61.0%) to 18.6% (10.3% to 29.0%). In conclusion, it was found possible to use a class solution approach to produce IMRT dose escalated plans. This IMRT technique has since been implemented clinically for patients enrolled in the hypofractionated dose escalation study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121701     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/66104316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  10 in total

1.  Dosimetry and preliminary acute toxicity in the first 100 men treated for prostate cancer on a randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial.

Authors:  Alan Pollack; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Steven J Feigenberg; Andre A Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; C-M Charlie Ma; Shawn W McNeeley; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert A Price
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A two-stage sequential linear programming approach to IMRT dose optimization.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Jianzhou Wu; Shahid A Naqvi; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Class solution in inverse planned HDR prostate brachytherapy for dose escalation of DIL defined by combined MRI/MRSI.

Authors:  Yongbok Kim; I-Chow J Hsu; Etienne Lessard; John Kurhanewicz; Susan Moyher Noworolski; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Equivalent normalized total dose estimates in cyberknife radiotherapy dose delivery in prostate cancer hypofractionation regimens.

Authors:  H Sudahar; P G G Kurup; V Murali; P Mahadev; J Velmurugan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

5.  The benefit of using bladder sub-volume equivalent uniform dose constraints in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Antoine Simon; Pascal Haigron; Caroline Lafond; Oscar Acosta; Huazhong Shu; Joel Castelli; Baosheng Li; Renaud De Crevoisier
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The dosimetric effect of mixed-energy IMRT plans for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; Chang Heon Choi; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A RapidArc planning strategy for prostate with simultaneous integrated boost.

Authors:  David Jolly; Dineli Alahakone; Juergen Meyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The effect of photon energy on intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Jong Min Park; Chang Heon Choi; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2012-03-31

9.  Dose-escalated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy in high-risk carcinoma of the prostate: outcome and late toxicity.

Authors:  David Thomson; Sophie Merrick; Ric Swindell; Joanna Coote; Kay Kelly; Julie Stratford; James Wylie; Richard Cowan; Tony Elliott; John Logue; Ananya Choudhury; Jacqueline Livsey
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-06-20

10.  Comparing two strategies of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in the hypofractionated treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jasper Yuen; George Rodrigues; Kristina Trenka; Terry Coad; Slav Yartsev; David D'Souza; Michael Lock; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.