OBJECTIVE: To examine the concordance between self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. METHODS: Sexually active adolescent and young adult women aged 14-21 years (N = 101) were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of HPV testing. Participants self-collected vaginal samples for HPV DNA, and clinicians collected cervicovaginal samples for HPV DNA and a cervical cytology specimen. We determined concordance between the results of self- and clinician-collected specimens using a kappa statistic and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Of the 51% of participants who were HPV positive, 53% had 1 type, 25% had 2 types, and 22% had 3 types or more; 25 different HPV types were identified. Self-collected samples detected more participants with HPV than clinician-collected samples (45% versus 42%, P =.65). When results were categorized into presence or absence of high-risk HPV types, agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimens was high (kappa 0.72) and the difference between test results was not significant (McNemar's P =.41). However, when all HPV types detected were considered, agreement was perfect in only 51% of those with 1 or more types of high-risk HPV type. There was no association between agreement and age or HPV type. CONCLUSION: Self testing for HPV DNA may be sufficiently sensitive for the detection of high-risk HPV DNA among adolescent and young adult women in clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the concordance between self-collected and clinician-collected samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. METHODS: Sexually active adolescent and young adult women aged 14-21 years (N = 101) were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of HPV testing. Participants self-collected vaginal samples for HPV DNA, and clinicians collected cervicovaginal samples for HPV DNA and a cervical cytology specimen. We determined concordance between the results of self- and clinician-collected specimens using a kappa statistic and McNemar's test. RESULTS: Of the 51% of participants who were HPV positive, 53% had 1 type, 25% had 2 types, and 22% had 3 types or more; 25 different HPV types were identified. Self-collected samples detected more participants with HPV than clinician-collected samples (45% versus 42%, P =.65). When results were categorized into presence or absence of high-risk HPV types, agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimens was high (kappa 0.72) and the difference between test results was not significant (McNemar's P =.41). However, when all HPV types detected were considered, agreement was perfect in only 51% of those with 1 or more types of high-risk HPV type. There was no association between agreement and age or HPV type. CONCLUSION: Self testing for HPV DNA may be sufficiently sensitive for the detection of high-risk HPV DNA among adolescent and young adult women in clinical settings.
Authors: Erik J Nelson; John Hughes; J Michael Oakes; Bharat Thyagarajan; James S Pankow; Shalini L Kulasingam Journal: J Community Health Date: 2015-06
Authors: Chelse Spinner; Lili Ding; David I Bernstein; Darron R Brown; Eduardo L Franco; Courtney Covert; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Akhila Balasubramanian; Shalini L Kulasingam; Atar Baer; James P Hughes; Evan R Myers; Constance Mao; Nancy B Kiviat; Laura A Koutsky Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Mónica Saccucci; Eduardo L Franco; Lili Ding; David I Bernstein; Darron Brown; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Isabel C Scarinci; Allison G Litton; Isabel C Garcés-Palacio; Edward E Partridge; Philip E Castle Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2013-02-12
Authors: Tasneem Shikary; David I Bernstein; Yan Jin; Gregory D Zimet; Susan L Rosenthal; Jessica A Kahn Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2009-08-08 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Marcia M Hobbs; Barbara van der Pol; Patricia Totten; Charlotte A Gaydos; Anna Wald; Terri Warren; Rachel L Winer; Robert L Cook; Carolyn D Deal; M Elizabeth Rogers; Julius Schachter; King K Holmes; David H Martin Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Janaica E J Grispen; Martine H P Ickenroth; Nanne K de Vries; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gaby Ronda; Trudy van der Weijden Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-03 Impact factor: 3.295