Literature DB >> 15121556

A randomized comparison of misoprostol 6 to 8 hours versus 24 hours after mifepristone for abortion.

Mitchell D Creinin1, Michelle C Fox, Stephanie Teal, Angela Chen, Eric A Schaff, Leslie A Meyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalence between mifepristone 200 mg followed 6 to 8 hours later and 24 hours later by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally for abortion in women up to 63 days of gestation.
METHODS: Mifepristone 200 mg was swallowed by 1,080 women after which they were randomly assigned to self-administer misoprostol intravaginally 6 to 8 hours later (group 1) or 23 to 25 hours later (group 2) at home. Participants returned for an evaluation, including transvaginal ultrasonography, 7 +/- 1 days after initiating treatment. Subjects who had not aborted were offered a second dose of misoprostol. All participants returned approximately 2 weeks after receiving mifepristone. Telephone contact was also attempted approximately 5 weeks after treatment. Treatment was considered a failure if a suction aspiration was performed for any indication.
RESULTS: Complete abortion rates for groups 1 and 2 were 503 of 525 (95.8%, 95% confidence interval 93.7%, 97.3%) and 521 of 531 (98.1%, 95% confidence interval 96.6%, 99.1%), respectively, which were statistically equivalent. Side effects were significantly more common after mifepristone administration for women in group 2. Nausea, vomiting, and heavy bleeding were also significantly greater for women in group 2 after misoprostol treatment. Pain and subject acceptability were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Mifepristone 200 mg followed 6 to 8 hours later by misoprostol 800 microg vaginally is as effective for abortion and has significantly fewer side effects as compared with regimens using a 24-hour dosing interval. Women receiving mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for abortion can have the flexibility to administer the misoprostol as soon as 6 hours after using the mifepristone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121556     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000124271.23499.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  Outcomes of medical abortion through 63 days in women with twin gestations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hayes; Sharon L Achilles; Mitchell D Creinin; Matthew F Reeves
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Mifepristone Pretreatment for the Medical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Courtney A Schreiber; Mitchell D Creinin; Jessica Atrio; Sarita Sonalkar; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thoai D Ngo; Min Hae Park; Haleema Shakur; Caroline Free
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Kunyan Zhou; Dan Shan; Xiaoyan Luo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 5.  Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  John J Reynolds-Wright; Mulat A Woldetsadik; Chelsea Morroni; Sharon Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Factors related to successful misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Mitchell D Creinin; Xiangke Huang; Carolyn Westhoff; Kurt Barnhart; Jerry M Gilles; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.

Authors:  Tara Shochet; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Is mifepristone 100mg an effective alternative to standard dose for medical abortion.

Authors:  Anupama Goel; Sandhya Mittal; Bk Taneja; Manisha Singhal
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 9.  Medical methods for first trimester abortion.

Authors:  Regina Kulier; Nathalie Kapp; A Metin Gülmezoglu; G Justus Hofmeyr; Linan Cheng; Aldo Campana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

10.  Comparing the World Health Organization-versus China-recommended protocol for first-trimester medical abortion: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Thoai D Ngo; Min Hae Park; Yuanhong Xiao
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.