Literature DB >> 15121493

End-of-life care in a voluntary hospitalist model: effects on communication, processes of care, and patient symptoms.

Andrew D Auerbach1, Steven Z Pantilat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of hospitalist care on communication, care patterns, and outcomes of dying patients.
METHODS: We examined the charts of 148 patients who had died at a community-based, urban teaching hospital, comparing the end-of-life care provided by community physicians and hospitalists.
RESULTS: Patients of hospitalists and community-based physicians were similar in age, race, severity of acute illness, and difficulties with activities of daily living. After admission, hospitalists had discussions with patients or their families regarding care more often than did community physicians (91% [67/74] vs. 73% [54/74], P = 0.006) and were more likely to document these discussions themselves. Among patients who were "full code" at admission, there was a trend towards patients of hospitalists receiving comfort care more frequently at the time of death (50% [25/48] vs. 37% [15/40], P = 0.14). Although there were no differences in the use of medications such as long-acting opioids, no symptoms in the 48 hours prior to death were more likely to be noted for patients of hospitalists (47% [n = 35] vs. 31% [n = 23]), P = 0.03). After adjustment for confounding factors in multivariable models, only findings regarding documentation of discussions and symptoms remained statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Hospitalists at a community-based teaching hospital documented substantial efforts to communicate with dying patients and their families, which may have resulted in improved end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121493     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

1.  Dancing around death: hospitalist-patient communication about serious illness.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Susan Kools; Audrey Lyndon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-10-03

2.  Health state information derived from secondary databases is affected by multiple sources of bias.

Authors:  Darcey D Terris; David G Litaker; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Factors associated with discussion of care plans and code status at the time of hospital admission: results from the Multicenter Hospitalist Study.

Authors:  Andrew D Auerbach; Rebecca Katz; Steven Z Pantilat; Rachelle Bernacki; Jeffrey Schnipper; Peter Kaboli; Tosha Wetterneck; David Gonzales; Vineet Arora; James Zhang; David Meltzer
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission.

Authors:  Wendy G Anderson; Rebecca Chase; Steven Z Pantilat; James A Tulsky; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures.

Authors:  Heather L White; Richard H Glazier
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes between Weekday-Only and Full-Time, 24-Hour/7-Day Coverage Hospitalist Systems.

Authors:  Seung Jun Han; Hee Won Jung; Do Youn Oh; Jae Hyun Lee; Sung Do Moon; Sunhye Lee; Jung Hwan Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.