Literature DB >> 15121254

Ultrasound-induced cell membrane porosity.

Cheri X Deng1, Fred Sieling, Hua Pan, Jianmin Cui.   

Abstract

Recent studies of ultrasound (US) methods for targeted drug delivery and nonviral gene transfection revealed new, advantageous possibilities. These studies utilized US contrast agents, commonly stabilized microbubbles, to facilitate delivery and suggested that US delivery resulted from cell sonoporation, the formation of temporary pores in the cell membrane induced by US. Using voltage clamp techniques, we obtained real-time measurements of sonoporation of single Xenopus oocyte in the presence of Optison trade mark, an agent consisting of albumin-shelled C(3)F(8) gas bubbles (mean diameter 3.2 microm). Ultrasound increased the transmembrane current as a direct result of decreased membrane resistance due to pore formation. We observed a distinct delay of sonoporation following US activation and characteristic stepwise increases of transmembrane current throughout US duration. We discovered that the resealing of cell membrane following US exposure required Ca(2+) entering the cell through US-induced pores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121254     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  83 in total

1.  Development of a theoretical model describing sonoporation activity of cells exposed to ultrasound in the presence of contrast agents.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability.

Authors:  Ji-Zhen Zhang; Jasdeep K Saggar; Zhao-Li Zhou; Bing Hu
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Effects of shear stress cultivation on cell membrane disruption and intracellular calcium concentration in sonoporation of endothelial cells.

Authors:  Juyoung Park; Zhenzhen Fan; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Tumor ablation and nanotechnology.

Authors:  Rachel L Manthe; Susan P Foy; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Blanka Sharma; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Intracellular delivery of Bak BH3 peptide by microbubble-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis for stroke therapy: better thrombus break-up with bubbles.

Authors:  Kathryn E Hitchcock; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Elisabetta Sassaroli; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustofluidic methods in cell analysis.

Authors:  Yuliang Xie; Hunter Bachman; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 12.296

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Muna Aryal; Costas D Arvanitis; Phillip M Alexander; Nathan McDannold
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.