Literature DB >> 15121147

Extended/advanced monitoring techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Franco Radaelli1, Vittorio Terruzzi, Giorgio Minoli.   

Abstract

The practice of sedation and analgesia is under increasing scrutiny by numerous regulatory agencies, with the aim of making these procedures safer and reducing the incidence of cardiopulmonary complications during GI endoscopy. As we move toward more evidence-based medicine, new technologies will have to be assessed in a manner that demonstrates their efficacy and utility in clinical practice. Although there have been no controlled studies examining whether more intensive monitoring during endoscopy improves outcomes, extended monitoring with capnography seems to offer an advantage over conventional monitoring in that, by providing a real-time indication of any change in adequate ventilation before oxygen desaturation occurs, it can detect early phases of respiratory depression, which can allow a more precise and safer titration of medications. There is a close agreement among experts that capnography may reduce the risk of adverse outcomes during deep sedation; therefore, its use should be required for patients undergoing advanced endoscopic procedures with the potential for deep sedation. Extended monitoring with capnography should also be endorsed whenever propofol is considered as an alternative to standard sedation with a benzodiazepine or narcotic. Our understanding of the clinical application of techniques for monitoring of depth of sedation is in its infancy, and its full contribution to the practice of endoscopy has yet to be determined. Their potential role in improving sedation practice during endoscopy needs to be confirmed by controlled trials. If we consider the lack of proven efficacy of these emerging monitoring techniques in reducing the adverse outcomes associated with sedation and analgesia, the importance of appropriate monitoring cannot be overemphasized. However, it is vital for the endoscopist to be thoroughly familiar with the type of sedation chosen, to be able to recognize the various levels of sedation, and, above all, to rescue patients should they unintentionally progress to a deeper level of sedation than intended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121147     DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2004.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am        ISSN: 1052-5157


  5 in total

1.  The value of Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) monitoring during endoscopies in children.

Authors:  Jamal Garah; Orly Eshach Adiv; Irit Rosen; Ron Shaoul
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Feasibility of breath monitoring in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy under propofol sedation: A single-center pilot study.

Authors:  Gurpreet W Anand; Ludwig T Heuss
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-16

3.  Effects of Sedation and/or Sedation/Analgesic Drugs Administered during Central Venous Catheterization on the Level of End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Measured by Nasal Cannula in Our PICU.

Authors:  Nagehan Aslan; Dincer Yildizdas; Ozden Ozgur Horoz; Didar Arslan; Yasemin Coban; Yasar Sertdemir
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08

Review 4.  Patient safety during procedural sedation using capnography monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rhodri Saunders; Michel M R F Struys; Richard F Pollock; Michael Mestek; Jenifer R Lightdale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Evaluation of Pharyngeal Function between No Bolus and Bolus Propofol Induced Sedation for Advanced Upper Endoscopy.

Authors:  Shinsuke Kiriyama; Hiroshi Naitoh; Minoru Fukuchi; Takaharu Fukasawa; Kana Saito; Yuichi Tabe; Hayato Yamauchi; Tomonori Yoshida; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2014-03-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.