AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cryopreserved arterial allografts in the management of prosthetic graft infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period 45 patients with infection of prosthetic vascular grafts were treated. There were 39 intra-abdominal infected grafts (group I) and six extra-abdominal infected grafts (group II). Treatment consisted of total graft removal and in situ or extra-anatomic implantation of cryopreserved arterial allografts. Six patients were operated on as an emergency. Four patients presented with aorto-enteric fistula. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 78 months. RESULTS: There were six in-hospital deaths and two additional patient deaths during follow-up, yielding an overall mortality rate of 18%. Six patients died due to complications directly related to infection or insertion of an allograft. Combined short and long-term mortality rate was much higher in patients operated on as an emergency (67%) compared to elective cases (11%). Patients with aorto-enteric fistula had the highest mortality rate (75%). Primary and secondary 3-year allograft patency rates for group I were 84 and 94%, respectively and for group II were 60 and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic allografts are useful in the treatment of infection of major vascular prosthetic grafts, except for patients with aorto-enteric fistula. Patients with infection of the prosthetic graft should be promptly assessed for graft removal, since results of elective surgery are much better than results of emergency procedures.
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cryopreserved arterial allografts in the management of prosthetic graft infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a 5-year period 45 patients with infection of prosthetic vascular grafts were treated. There were 39 intra-abdominal infected grafts (group I) and six extra-abdominal infected grafts (group II). Treatment consisted of total graft removal and in situ or extra-anatomic implantation of cryopreserved arterial allografts. Six patients were operated on as an emergency. Four patients presented with aorto-enteric fistula. Follow-up ranged from 30 to 78 months. RESULTS: There were six in-hospital deaths and two additional patient deaths during follow-up, yielding an overall mortality rate of 18%. Six patients died due to complications directly related to infection or insertion of an allograft. Combined short and long-term mortality rate was much higher in patients operated on as an emergency (67%) compared to elective cases (11%). Patients with aorto-enteric fistula had the highest mortality rate (75%). Primary and secondary 3-year allograft patency rates for group I were 84 and 94%, respectively and for group II were 60 and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic allografts are useful in the treatment of infection of major vascular prosthetic grafts, except for patients with aorto-enteric fistula. Patients with infection of the prosthetic graft should be promptly assessed for graft removal, since results of elective surgery are much better than results of emergency procedures.