Literature DB >> 15118976

Predictors of outcome of pneumatic dilation in achalasia.

Kaveh Farhoomand1, Jason T Connor, Joel E Richter, Edgar Achkar, Michael F Vaezi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Graded pneumatic dilation (PD) is a widely accepted treatment for achalasia. We investigated the potential predictors of outcome in a large group of patients with achalasia and tested the hypothesis that graded PD may not be appropriate for all patients.
METHODS: Patients undergoing PD from 1992 to 2002 were evaluated retrospectively. Symptom scores (0-15) for dysphagia (0-5), regurgitation (0-5), and chest pain (0-5), as well as degree of esophageal emptying by timed barium swallow, were assessed for all patients. Failure was defined as the return of symptoms resulting in repeated PD or surgical myotomy. Clinical data assessed for short- and long-term predictors of response.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients with achalasia without previous therapy constituted the studied population. Three-year success rates for PD using 3.0-cm, 3.0-cm followed by 3.5-cm, and 3.0-cm and 3.5-cm followed by 4.0-cm Rigiflex balloons were 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-53), 76% (95% CI, 65-88), and 88% (95% CI, 80-97), respectively. Patient age and sex were important treatment outcome predictors. A Cox proportional hazards model of time to additional therapy on sex and 10-year increase in age showed that 3.0-cm PD was significantly (P = 0.04) more likely to fail in younger men than older men (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.98). In 25 of 68 patients (37%) initially treated with a 3.0-cm balloon, PD failed within 3 months. Twenty-two of 25 patients (88%) with early failure were men.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Young men have a greater failure rate with 3.0-cm PD than older men or women in general, and (2) graded PD in this group starting initially with the 3.0-cm balloon is more likely to fail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118976     DOI: 10.1016/s1542-3565(04)00123-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  35 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Timothy M Farrell; Geoffrey P Kohn; Vedra Augenstein; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Possible new endoscopic finding in patients with achalasia: "Gingko leaf sign".

Authors:  Yoshimasa Hoshikawa; Shintaro Hoshino; Noriyuki Kawami; Tomohide Tanabe; Yuriko Hanada; Nana Takenouchi; Osamu Goto; Mitsuru Kaise; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.230

3.  The American College of Gastroenterology's New Guidelines on Achalasia: what clinicians need to know.

Authors:  Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

4.  High-resolution manometry is comparable to timed barium esophagogram for assessing response to pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia.

Authors:  Uday C Ghoshal; Mahesh Gupta; Abhai Verma; Zafar Neyaz; Samir Mohindra; Asha Misra; Vivek A Saraswat
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-26

Review 5.  Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell; Stavros Nicholas Stavropoulos; David Friedel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Epidemiology and practice patterns of achalasia in a large multi-centre database.

Authors:  B K Enestvedt; J L Williams; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  Modern management of achalasia.

Authors:  Joel E Richter
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

Review 8.  Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristle L Lynch; John E Pandolfino; Colin W Howden; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Hospitalization for achalasia in the United States 1997-2006.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Predictors of a better outcome of pneumatic dilatation in patients with primary achalasia.

Authors:  Yuriko Tanaka; Katsuhiko Iwakiri; Noriyuki Kawami; Hirohito Sano; Mariko Umezawa; Makoto Kotoyori; Yoshio Hoshihara; Tsutomu Nomura; Masao Miyashita; Choitsu Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.