Literature DB >> 15118751

Differences in source emission rates of volatile organic compounds in inner-city residences of New York City and Los Angeles.

Sonja N Sax1, Deborah H Bennett, Steven N Chillrud, Patrick L Kinney, John D Spengler.   

Abstract

The Toxics Exposure Assessment Columbia-Harvard (TEACH) Project characterized personal, indoor, and outdoor concentrations of a suite of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for high school students living in New York City (NYC) and Los Angeles (LA). This paper presents the analysis of VOC measurements collected indoors and outdoors for 46 students' homes in NYC and for 41 students' homes in LA across two seasons. Dual-sorbent thermal desorption tubes were used for the collection of 15 VOCs and C(18) 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-coated cartridges were used for the collection of seven aldehydes. Air-exchange rates (AERs) were also measured using a perfluorocarbon tracer gas method. The AERs were lower in the winter in both cities, averaging 1 h(-1) in NYC and 1.4 h(-1) in LA, compared with 1.8 h(-1) in NYC in the summer and 2.5 h(-1) in LA in the fall. Higher AERs were generally associated with lower indoor-outdoor ratios with significant differences for the compounds with indoor sources, including chloroform, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and formaldehyde. Using a mass-balance model to account for AER and other housing parameters, effective source emission rates (SER) were calculated for each compound. Based on I/O ratios and source emission rates, VOCs could be divided into: (1). indoor-source-influenced compounds, (2). those with contributions from both indoor and outdoor sources, and (3). those with mostly outdoor sources. Significant indoor sources were found for the following six compounds (mean emission rates presented): chloroform (0.11 mg/h), 1,4-dichlorobenzene (19 mg/h), formaldehyde (5 mg/h), acetaldehyde (2 mg/h), benzaldehyde (0.6 mg/h), and hexaldehyde (2 mg/h). Although chloroform had variable I/O ratios across seasons, SERs, which accounted for AER, were similar in both cities for both seasons (e.g., LA means 0.12 and 0.11 mg/h in winter and fall, respectively). Formaldehyde had substantially higher indoor emission rates in the summer in NYC compared to winter (3.8 vs. 1.6 mg/h) but lower in the fall in LA compared to winter (4.3 vs. 5.0 mg/h). Uncertainty analysis determined that source strength calculations were not sensitive to measurement error for a subset of homes in LA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118751     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  18 in total

1.  Toxics Use Reduction in the Home: Lessons Learned from Household Exposure Studies.

Authors:  Sarah C Dunagan; Robin E Dodson; Ruthann A Rudel; Julia G Brody
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 9.297

2.  Concentrations and risks of p-dichlorobenzene in indoor and outdoor air.

Authors:  J-Y Chin; C Godwin; C Jia; T Robins; T Lewis; E Parker; P Max; S Batterman
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Proximity of licensed child care facilities to near-roadway vehicle pollution.

Authors:  Douglas Houston; Paul Ong; Jun Wu; Arthur Winer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Oxygenated VOCs, aqueous chemistry, and potential impacts on residential indoor air composition.

Authors:  S M Duncan; K G Sexton; B J Turpin
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Dynamics of Residential Water-Soluble Organic Gases: Insights into Sources and Sinks.

Authors:  Sara M Duncan; Sophie Tomaz; Glenn Morrison; Marc Webb; Joanna Atkin; Jason D Surratt; Barbara J Turpin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Benzene exposure: an overview of monitoring methods and their findings.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  Levels, sources, and health risks of carbonyls in residential indoor air in Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Mili Weng; Lizhong Zhu; Kun Yang; Shuguang Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Potential air toxics hot spots in truck terminals and cabs.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Mary E Davis; Jaime E Hart; Andrew Blicharz; Francine Laden; Eric Garshick
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2012-12

9.  Indoor concentrations of nicotine in low-income, multi-unit housing: associations with smoking behaviours and housing characteristics.

Authors:  T A Kraev; G Adamkiewicz; S K Hammond; J D Spengler
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Cancer risk disparities between hispanic and non-hispanic white populations: the role of exposure to indoor air pollution.

Authors:  Diana E Hun; Jeffrey A Siegel; Maria T Morandi; Thomas H Stock; Richard L Corsi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.